CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The United States FAA has issued AD 2006-15-18 affecting Boeing model 737 aircraft. The United States is the State of Design for these types. CASA has assessed this AD and has issued Australian AD/B737/293, which will become effective on 28 September 2006.
As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD. The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, New Technologies and Systems, in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Australian Parliament, aims to ensure the safety of air navigation and establish regulations for civil aviation. The Act allows the Governor-General to make regulations under section 98, which were further detailed in the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. Specifically, regulation 39.001 empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for certain types of aircraft or aeronautical products, with such ADs being considered legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. These airworthiness directives play a critical role in ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, aligning with the obligations under Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which designates the State of Design as responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. CASA, acting as Australia's national airworthiness authority, must assess information from the State of Design and, if necessary, issue corresponding Australian ADs to ensure compliance with international standards and obligations.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 and its associated Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provide a framework for ensuring the safety of air navigation in Australia, with a specific focus on the issuance of airworthiness directives (ADs) to maintain the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue ADs for particular types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are legislative instruments that are subject to disallowance and are made in accordance with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The application of these ADs extends to all aircraft and aeronautical products registered within Australia, thereby affecting aircraft manufacturers, operators, and other relevant entities. Geographic scope is determined by Australia’s obligations under international conventions such as Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which mandates that the State of Design has responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and that States of Registry must implement the necessary measures to ensure compliance. While ADs are generally issued in response to international directives, CASA retains the authority to tailor these directives to the specific context of the Australian aviation industry.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 under section 39.001 grant the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) the authority to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. This authority is exercised under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act, with a focus on ensuring the safety of air navigation. Section 39.001(5) of the Regulations identifies ADs as disallowable instruments under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, thereby classifying them as legislative instruments according to section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
These airworthiness directives serve as a critical mechanism for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, a responsibility that falls upon the State of Design, as outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The State of Design must provide necessary information to the appropriate States of Registry to ensure that the aircraft type maintains airworthiness. The State of Registry, in turn, is tasked with developing or adopting requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft registered within its jurisdiction. For instance, when the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued AD 2006-15-18 concerning Boeing model 737 aircraft, CASA, acting as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, was required to assess this directive and, if deemed appropriate, issue an Australian AD to enforce the requirements of the State of Design.
The issuance of ADs is governed by specific obligations and requirements. CASA must evaluate the ADs issued by the State of Design and determine their applicability to aircraft registered in Australia. If the AD is relevant, CASA issues a corresponding Australian AD, mandating compliance with the specified safety measures. The process does not require public consultation, as the ADs are issued pursuant to Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and in response to directives from the relevant State of Design. The Office of Regulatory Review has also determined that ADs do not necessitate a Regulatory Impact Statement.
Breaching the requirements set out in an airworthiness directive can have serious legal consequences. Non-compliance with an AD can result in civil and criminal penalties. The specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the provided text, but under Australian law, breaches of aviation regulations can lead to fines, imprisonment, or both. For example, under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, individuals or entities found to be in violation of ADs may face substantial fines, and in severe cases, imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as other relevant factors considered by the courts.