AD/B737/228 Amdt 1 - Honeywell Start Converter Unit

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2012L01608 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.

The FAA issued 2004-10-10, affecting Boeing 737 aircraft, in 2004.  The USA is the State of Design for this type.  As a result of a request from industry, CASA has amended the equivalent Australian AD to accept an FAA approved Alternate Means of Compliance (AMOC).  The amended AD, AD/B737/228 Amdt 1, will become effective on 27 July 2012.  This AD cancels and replaces the previous issue.

As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD.

The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

Compatibility with human rights and freedoms

This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

 

Human Rights Implications

The instrument sets out technical requirements as detailed above.  The instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

The instrument is compatible with human rights and freedoms.

The AD has been made by the Acting Manager, Continuing Airworthiness, in the Airworthiness and Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 94 (1) of the Act.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation in Australia, reflecting the country's obligations under international conventions and the need for a robust regulatory framework to manage the complexities of air navigation. Under this Act, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were established, which empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) to maintain the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. The ADs are legislative instruments that mandate specific actions or modifications to ensure safety, and they are issued in response to international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the specific requirements of the aircraft's State of Design. This legislative framework aims to uphold safety standards and coordinate regulatory efforts across different jurisdictions, ensuring that all aircraft operating in Australia meet necessary safety criteria. The ADs, therefore, play a crucial role in maintaining the high safety standards expected in civil aviation.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, under section 39.001, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are legislative instruments, subject to disallowance under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and are governed by the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The application of these ADs is contingent upon Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, specifically Annex 8, which designates the State of Design as responsible for the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types and mandates the provision of necessary information to States of Registry. CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, is required to assess such information and, if appropriate, issue corresponding ADs to enforce the requirements of the State of Design. In this instance, CASA has amended an existing Australian AD to accept a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved Alternate Means of Compliance (AMOC) for Boeing 737 aircraft, reflecting a collaborative approach to maintaining airworthiness standards. The AD, AD/B737/228 Amdt 1, replaces the previous AD and becomes effective on 27 July 2012, following a request from industry. This amendment ensures compliance with international airworthiness standards without the need for public consultation due to the regulatory framework established under the Convention. Furthermore, the Office of Regulatory Review has confirmed that ADs do not necessitate a Regulatory Impact Statement, and CASA has determined that this AD is compatible with human rights and freedoms as outlined in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this piece of legislation pertain to the issuance and implementation of airworthiness directives (ADs) for certain types of aircraft. Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 allows the Governor-General to make regulations for the safety of air navigation, while regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue ADs for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. It is crucial to note that these ADs are legislative instruments as per the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and they serve as a common form of continuing airworthiness information as stipulated in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. The State of Design has the overarching responsibility for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to the appropriate States of Registry. The State of Registry, in turn, is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft and must develop or adopt requirements to ensure this. When an AD is issued by the State of Design, CASA must assess this information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design. This ensures a consistent approach to airworthiness across international borders and adheres to the obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation. There are specific offences, penalties, or consequences outlined for breaches of these regulations. While the text does not detail specific penalties, it is implied that failure to comply with an AD could result in severe consequences, including potential grounding of the aircraft, fines, or other legal actions. The severity of these consequences underscores the importance of adhering to the airworthiness directives to maintain safety standards in the aviation industry. The legislation does not require consultation with the Australian public or a Regulatory Impact Statement, as it is based on international obligations and the need to align with ADs from the relevant State of Design. Moreover, the Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not necessitate a Regulatory Impact Statement. This decision is based on the technical nature of the requirements and their alignment with international standards. In conclusion, this piece of legislation mandates the issuance and implementation of airworthiness directives for certain aircraft types, ensuring safety and compliance with international standards. The obligations on the State of Design, State of Registry, and CASA are clearly defined to maintain airworthiness, and the implications for human rights are minimal as the directives focus on technical requirements. The compatibility with human rights and freedoms has been confirmed by the Office of Regulatory Review, and the AD has been issued in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Aviation Act 1988.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.