COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Boeing 737 Series Aeroplanes
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
AD/B737/159 Engine Fuel Shutoff Valve Wiring 9/2001
Applicability: The following models and series of aeroplanes as listed in the Service Bulletins (SB) below:
Aeroplane Model Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-300, 737-400, 737-500 737-28-1164, dated 24 August 2000.
737-600, 737-700, 737-800 737-28-1160, Revision 1, dated 26 October 2000.
Requirement: 1. Perform a test to determine if there is continuity or to measure voltage, as applicable, of the two electrical circuits that close the fuel shutoff valve on the wing spar. Carry out the test in accordance with Special Attention SB 737-28- 1164 or SB 737-28-1164, Revision 1, dated 10 May 2001 (for Model 737-300, 737-400, and 737-500 series aeroplanes); or Special Attention SB 737-28-1160, Revision 1 (for Model 737-600, 737-700, and 737-800 series aeroplanes).
2. For Model 737-300, 737-400 and 737-500 series aeroplanes - If any discontinuity is detected, repair the discontinuity in accordance with SB 737-28- 1164.
3. For Model 737-600, 737-700 and 737-800 series aeroplanes - If any measurement is not between 21 and 34 volts direct current (DC), repair the discrepancy in accordance with SB 737-28-1160, Revision 1.
Note 1: Tests accomplished per Special Attention SB 737-28-1160 (for Model 737- 600, 737-700 and 737-800 series aeroplanes), dated 5 June 2000 are acceptable for compliance with this Directive.
Note 2: Tests accomplished prior to the effective date of this Directive per Boeing All Base Telex M-7200-00-01064, dated 24 April 2000; Boeing Telex SWA-DAL-00- 00182H, dated 27 March, 2000; Boeing Telex CAL-IAH-00-00681H, dated 17 April 2000; Boeing All Base Telex M-7200-00-01231, dated 31May 2000; or Boeing Telex AAL-AFW-00-00324H, dated 27 March 2000; are acceptable for compliance with this Directive.
Note 3: FAA AD 2001-13-07 Amdt 39-12287 refers.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Compliance: For Requirement 1 - Within six months after the effective date of this Directive.
For Requirement 2 - Before further flight after the Requirement 1 test. For Requirement 3 - Before further flight after the Requirement 1 test. This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 6 September 2001.
Background: This Directive requires a test of the two electrical circuits that close the fuel shutoff valve on the wing spar, and repair, if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent inability to shut off the flow of fuel to an engine after an uncontained engine failure which could result in a fire spreading to other parts of the aeroplane.
James Coyne
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 20 July 2001
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 15 August 2001.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, which were enacted by the Parliament of Australia, establish the framework for ensuring the safety and airworthiness of aircraft operating within Australia. Part 39 of these Regulations includes the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, which mandate specific actions to address identified safety issues. One such directive, AD/B737/159, pertains to Boeing 737 series aeroplanes and was introduced to address a potential unsafe condition related to the engine fuel shutoff valve wiring. The policy objective behind this directive is to prevent the inability to shut off the flow of fuel to an engine after an uncontained engine failure, which could result in a fire spreading to other parts of the aeroplane. CASA issued this Airworthiness Directive under subregulation 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, requiring specific testing and, if necessary, repairs to the electrical circuits that close the fuel shutoff valve on the wing spar. The directive became effective on 6 September 2001 and requires compliance within specified timeframes to ensure that the identified safety issue is resolved.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105 under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, applies to the Boeing 737 Series Aeroplanes, including models 737-300, 737-400, 737-500, 737-600, 737-700, and 737-800. This legislation mandates the action required to address a specific unsafe condition concerning the engine fuel shutoff valve wiring. The Airworthiness Directive (AD) applies to all the listed Boeing 737 models and series, as specified in the Service Bulletins (SB) referenced within the directive. The directive is effective across the Commonwealth of Australia and mandates that the required actions must be performed by entities and individuals involved in the operation and maintenance of these aircraft. Compliance with the AD is necessary to ensure the safety of air travel by mitigating the risk of fire following an uncontained engine failure. The directive outlines specific tests and repairs that must be carried out within specified timeframes to maintain airworthiness standards.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this Airworthiness Directive (AD) mandate specific actions to address a potential unsafe condition related to the fuel shutoff valve wiring on Boeing 737 series aeroplanes. The AD requires testing of the two electrical circuits that close the fuel shutoff valve on the wing spar, and, if necessary, repair the circuits to ensure continuity or correct voltage levels (section 1). The directive specifies that for models 737-300, 737-400, and 737-500, any detected discontinuity must be repaired in accordance with Special Attention Service Bulletin (SB) 737-28-1164. For models 737-600, 737-700, and 737-800, if any measurement is not between 21 and 34 volts direct current (DC), the discrepancy must be repaired according to SB 737-28-1160, Revision 1 (section 2 and 3). This action is necessary to prevent the inability to shut off the flow of fuel to an engine after an uncontained engine failure, which could lead to a fire spreading to other parts of the aeroplane.
The obligations imposed by this AD on the parties it governs, primarily aircraft operators and maintenance personnel, include performing the specified tests and repairs within the stipulated timeframes. Operators and maintenance personnel must conduct the tests within six months of the directive's effective date (section 1) and ensure that any necessary repairs are completed before further flight following the tests (sections 2 and 3). Compliance with the AD is essential to maintain the airworthiness of the affected Boeing 737 series aeroplanes and to ensure passenger and crew safety during flight operations.
Breaches of this AD may result in significant consequences. While the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 do not specify particular offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for non-compliance with ADs, failure to adhere to the AD could lead to the grounding of the aircraft, which would prevent the operator from conducting any flights until the required actions are completed. Additionally, non-compliance could result in enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), including fines, suspension of air operator certificates, or other regulatory penalties. Such breaches could also lead to civil liabilities for damages resulting from any incidents caused by the non-compliance, as well as potential criminal charges if gross negligence or willful misconduct is found to be a factor.