COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Boeing 737 Series Aeroplanes
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
AD/B737/147 Cabin Door Handle Mounting Hub 11/2000
Applicability: Model 737-200, -300, -400, and -500 series aircraft; as listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1322 Revision 2.
Requirement: Replace existing door handle mounting hub assemblies in the forward and aft entry doors, forward galley door, and aft service door, with new improved hub assemblies in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin (SB) 737-25-1322 Revision 2, dated 19 February 1998.
Note 1: Replacements accomplished prior to the effective date of this Directive in accordance with SB 737-25-1322 or SB 737-25-1322 Revision 1, are acceptable for compliance with the Requirement of this Directive.
Note 2: FAA AD 2000-14-13 Amdt 39-11823 refers.
Compliance: Before 2 May 2002, unless already accomplished.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 2 November 2000.
Background: The FAA received reports of cracked or broken door handle mounting hub assemblies for the interior door handles on the cabin doors. A damaged mounting hub could result in the interior door handle breaking off while the door is being opened, and in an emergency situation, could impede evacuation of the aircraft.
David Alan Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 13 September 2000
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 4 October 2000.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Government, aim to ensure the safety of civil aviation within Australia. Part 39 - 105 of these regulations, which was updated in 2006, is specifically concerned with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority’s (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives. This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for continuous oversight and enforcement of aircraft airworthiness standards, ensuring that all aircraft operating within Australia meet the necessary safety requirements. The objective of this specific Airworthiness Directive is to mitigate the risk of unsafe conditions by requiring specific actions to be taken on certain aircraft models to rectify identified safety issues. This approach ensures that the Civil Aviation Safety Authority can promptly address emerging safety concerns and maintain the high safety standards expected in Australian civil aviation.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998) apply to various aviation operations, including the maintenance and modification of aircraft, and in this instance, specifically target the Boeing 737 Series Aeroplanes. The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under subregulation 39.1(1) of CAR 1998 mandates that the specified action be undertaken to address an identified safety concern. This particular AD/B737/147 pertains to Model 737-200, -300, -400, and -500 series aircraft and requires the replacement of existing door handle mounting hub assemblies with new improved ones as outlined in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1322 Revision 2. This directive ensures that the modifications are carried out before 2 May 2002 to mitigate the risk of interior door handles breaking off during operation, which could potentially hinder evacuation in an emergency.
Key Provisions
The Airworthiness Directive (AD) B737/147 applies to Boeing 737-200, -300, -400, and -500 series aircraft, as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1322 Revision 2. The directive mandates that the existing door handle mounting hub assemblies in the forward and aft entry doors, forward galley door, and aft service door be replaced with improved hub assemblies. This requirement is detailed in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1322 Revision 2, dated 19 February 1998. The AD allows for compliance if the replacements were already performed before the effective date of this directive in accordance with the Service Bulletin or its previous revision. It is important to note that these actions must be completed before 2 May 2002, unless already accomplished, and the directive became effective on 2 November 2000.
The obligations imposed by this AD on the operators of Boeing 737-200, -300, -400, and -500 series aircraft include ensuring that the specified door handle mounting hub assemblies are replaced as per the instructions given in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1322 Revision 2. Operators must ensure that the replacements are carried out before the compliance date of 2 May 2002. They must also maintain records of the replacement actions taken, as the AD requires adherence to specific technical instructions to correct the identified unsafe condition.
Failure to comply with the AD B737/147 could result in significant safety risks, as the original door handle mounting hub assemblies have been reported to crack or break, potentially causing the interior door handle to detach during operation. In an emergency, this could impede the evacuation of the aircraft, leading to potential loss of life. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) delegate, David Alan Villiers, issued this directive to mitigate these risks. Non-compliance with ADs is not only a safety issue but may also result in legal consequences, including enforcement actions by CASA or other regulatory authorities. The exact nature and extent of the penalties would depend on the specific circumstances and the severity of the non-compliance.