COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Boeing 727 Series Aeroplanes
AD/B727/165 Upper and Lower Sills of Number 1 Cargo Door 1/2000
Applicability: All Model 727-200 series aircraft.
Requirement: Action in accordance with the technical requirements of FAA AD 99-23-13 Amdt 39- 11409.
Note: Boeing Service Bulletin 727-53A0219 Revision 1 refers.
Compliance: As specified in the Requirement document for the initial and repetitive inspections, with a revised effective date of 31 December 1999.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 31 December 1999.
Background: The FAA received reports of fatigue cracks in certain structures adjacent to the number 1 cargo door cutout at the forward and aft doorway frames. Such cracking could result in rapid decompression of the fuselage and consequent reduced structural integrity of the aircraft.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provide the overarching legal framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia. Within this framework, Part 39 - 105, which pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, specifically addresses the safety and airworthiness of aircraft. The legislation was introduced to ensure that civil aviation operations in Australia comply with stringent safety standards, particularly those pertaining to the maintenance and operation of aircraft to prevent accidents and incidents. This legislative instrument, identified as F2006B02688, focuses on Boeing 727 Series Aeroplanes, specifically addressing issues related to the upper and lower sills of the number 1 cargo door through Airworthiness Directive AD/B727/165, effective from 31 December 1999. The directive mandates compliance with the technical requirements outlined in FAA AD 99-23-13 Amdt 39-11409, aimed at rectifying reported fatigue cracks in the cargo door area which could compromise the aircraft's structural integrity.
This Airworthiness Directive underscores the policy objective of ensuring that all Model 727-200 series aircraft meet specific inspection and maintenance criteria to prevent catastrophic failures due to structural weaknesses. By referencing the Boeing Service Bulletin 727-53A0219 Revision 1, the directive provides a clear pathway for compliance, ensuring that initial and repetitive inspections are conducted as specified. The effective date for compliance was set to 31 December 1999, reflecting a proactive approach to addressing potential safety hazards in commercial aviation.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, pertain to the maintenance and operation of aircraft within Australia, and specifically, Part 39 - 105 applies to the Boeing 727 series aeroplanes with regard to airworthiness directives. This particular directive, AD/B727/165, targets the upper and lower sills of the number 1 cargo door on all Model 727-200 series aircraft, mandating actions in accordance with the technical requirements outlined in FAA AD 99-23-13 Amendment 39-11409. Compliance necessitates adherence to the specified inspection intervals and procedures detailed in the requirement document, with the directive taking effect from 31 December 1999. The directive responds to concerns raised by the FAA regarding fatigue cracks in the structures adjacent to the number 1 cargo door cutout, which could lead to significant safety issues such as rapid decompression and compromised aircraft integrity. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this directive is national, applying to all Boeing 727-200 series aircraft operating within Australia, subject to the Commonwealth's aviation safety regulations.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, includes Airworthiness Directives (ADs) that govern the maintenance and operational standards of aircraft. Section 39-105 of the regulations pertains to AD/B727/165, which addresses the upper and lower sills of the number 1 cargo door on Boeing 727 Series Aeroplanes, specifically the 727-200 series. This directive, effective from 31 December 1999, requires all applicable aircraft to adhere to the technical requirements outlined in FAA AD 99-23-13 Amendment 39-11409. Boeing Service Bulletin 727-53A0219 Revision 1 also references this directive. Compliance with these requirements necessitates following the inspection and maintenance protocols specified in the relevant technical documentation, with a revised effective date for these inspections as of 31 December 1999.
Under the Civil Aviation Regulations, operators of Boeing 727-200 series aircraft must ensure that all maintenance and inspection activities comply with the provisions set forth in AD/B727/165. This includes performing initial and repetitive inspections as specified in the Requirement document, which mandates detailed checks and possible repairs to the upper and lower sills of the number 1 cargo door to prevent the development of fatigue cracks. Operators must document all actions taken to ensure compliance and maintain records of inspections and repairs in accordance with regulatory standards. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to serious safety issues, including the potential for rapid decompression and compromised structural integrity of the aircraft.
Failure to comply with AD/B727/165 can result in significant legal and safety consequences. The Civil Aviation Regulations stipulate that non-compliance with Airworthiness Directives can lead to enforcement actions, including the suspension or revocation of an aircraft's certificate of airworthiness. Civil penalties may be imposed, which can include fines up to $22,222 for corporations and $4,444 for individuals, as outlined in the Civil Aviation Act 1988. In addition to civil penalties, operators and maintenance personnel may face criminal charges if their actions are deemed to have recklessly endangered the safety of an aircraft. Such criminal offences can result in substantial fines and imprisonment, with maximum penalties varying according to the severity of the breach and the impact on aviation safety.