COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Boeing 727 Series Aeroplanes
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/B727/144 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
AD/B727/144
Amdt 1
Wing Centre Section Front Spar Web 4/2000
Applicability: Model 727 series aircraft, as listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57-0177, dated 22 December 1988.
Requirement: Action in accordance with the technical requirements of FAA AD 2000-02-19 Amdt 39-11537.
Compliance: As specified in the Requirement document for the repetitive inspections and modification action, with a revised effective date of 20 April 2000.
This Amendment becomes effective on 20 April 2000.
Background: Fleet experience had shown that there was a possibility of cracks developing in the wing centre section front spar web, if not corrected could lead to fuel leakage or depressurisation of the cabin.
Amendment 1 is issued in response to a new FAA AD which was prompted by a report indicating that the optional terminating modification in the existing FAA AD does not adequately address the identified unsafe condition. This amendment requires a new terminating modification for the repetitive inspections.
The original issue of this Airworthiness Directive became effective on 3 March 2000.
Bernard Malcolm Hole
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 9 March 2000
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 22 March 2000.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), include Part 39, which provides detailed requirements for ensuring the airworthiness of aircraft. Specifically, Schedule 105 of these regulations pertains to Airworthiness Directives, which are regulatory mandates that address safety concerns identified in aircraft operations. One such Airworthiness Directive, AD/B727/144, was revoked and replaced with a new directive to address safety issues associated with the Boeing 727 series aeroplanes. The problem this directive aimed to resolve was the potential for cracks in the wing centre section front spar web, which could lead to severe consequences such as fuel leakage or cabin depressurisation. The directive was introduced in response to fleet experience and reports from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and it was enacted to ensure that corrective actions were taken to mitigate these risks.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/B727/144 pertains to the Boeing 727 Series Aeroplanes and specifically addresses the issue of potential cracks in the wing centre section front spar web, a problem identified through fleet experience. The AD applies to all Model 727 series aircraft as listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57-0177 dated 22 December 1988. The directive requires compliance with the technical requirements of FAA AD 2000-02-19 Amdt 39-11537, necessitating corrective actions to prevent unsafe conditions such as fuel leakage or cabin depressurisation. The directive outlines specific actions, compliance timelines, and a revised effective date of 20 April 2000, replacing the earlier AD/B727/144 which was found to not adequately address the safety issue. This amendment was necessitated by a new FAA AD issued in response to a report that highlighted the inadequacies of the original optional terminating modification. The AD is applicable throughout the Commonwealth of Australia and is enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), with the authority to revoke and issue such directives under subregulation 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically within PART 39 - 105, pertain to the requirements for ensuring the airworthiness of Boeing 727 series aeroplanes. This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998 and mandates specific actions to address a potential unsafe condition in the wing centre section front spar web of these aircraft (section 4). The requirement is that the corrective action must be taken in accordance with the technical specifications outlined in FAA AD 2000-02-19 Amdt 39-11537 (section 4). The compliance section specifies that the action must be carried out in alignment with the instructions in the requirement document, with a compliance deadline set for 20 April 2000 (section 4).
The obligations imposed by this AD on the relevant parties, including aircraft operators, maintenance providers, and other stakeholders, are to conduct the specified inspections and modifications as outlined in FAA AD 2000-02-19 Amdt 39-11537. The directive explicitly states that the actions must be performed on all model 727 series aircraft listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57-0177 dated 22 December 1988 (section 4). These obligations are aimed at ensuring that the identified unsafe condition, which could lead to serious issues such as fuel leakage or cabin depressurisation, is effectively mitigated. Compliance with the directive is mandatory, and failure to adhere to the specified requirements may result in significant safety and regulatory consequences.
Any breach of this Airworthiness Directive may result in serious consequences under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. Specifically, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can lead to the grounding of the affected aircraft, which can severely disrupt operational activities. Furthermore, any failure to comply with the AD may be treated as a breach of civil aviation regulations, which can result in enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The maximum penalties for such breaches can include substantial fines and potential criminal charges for individuals responsible for the oversight of the aircraft maintenance and operations. It is imperative that all parties involved strictly adhere to the AD to avoid these severe repercussions.