COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Boeing 727 Series Aeroplanes
AD/B727/131
Amdt 1
Fuselage Skin Cracking 3/93
Applicability: Boeing 727-200 series aircraft, line numbers 433 to 1832 inclusive.
Requirement: Perform a detailed visual or High Frequency Eddy Current inspection for fuselage skin cracks along Stringer 1 from Body Station (BS) 1090 to BS 1110 and along the fairing attachment angle from BS 1095 to BS 1110 in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-53A0204.
Note: FAA AD 91-03-19 R1 refers.
Compliance: Inspect before exceeding 3000 flights or 18 months, whichever occurs sooner, since the last inspection conducted in accordance with the original issue of this Directive. Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 3000 flights or 18 months, whichever occurs sooner, or until one of the following preventative actions occurs:
(1) The aircraft is modified before cracks are found in accordance with Boeing Drawing 65C35757 or Paragraph C of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-53A0204 Revision 2 or Revision 3; or
(2) The aircraft is repaired, if cracked, in accordance with Part III, Paragraph B or Paragraph D, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-53A0204 Revision 3.
Note: Modification or repair in this manner removes the requirement for repetitive inspection, however local repair in accordance with the Boeing Structural Repair Manual does not.
Background: The original issue of this Directive referred to FAA AD 91-03-19 which specified repetitive inspection to detect cracks of the fuselage skin under the centre engine inlet pedestal housing. This action was required to avoid the possibility of rapid decompression of the cabin. This amendment revises the existing Directive to increase the allowable number of flights between inspections and to document the option of modification or repair to remove the requirement for repetitive inspections.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, were enacted to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. Part 39 - 105 of these regulations includes specific Airworthiness Directives (ADs) for maintaining aircraft safety. AD/B727/131, Amendment 1, pertains to the Boeing 727 series aeroplanes, addressing the problem of fuselage skin cracking. This directive was introduced to mitigate the risk of rapid cabin decompression by mandating detailed inspections and, where necessary, modifications or repairs of the affected areas. The policy objective behind this directive is to ensure ongoing airworthiness and passenger safety by regularly monitoring and addressing structural integrity issues on these aircraft.
Compliance with AD/B727/131 requires that Boeing 727-200 series aircraft undergo a detailed visual or High Frequency Eddy Current inspection for fuselage skin cracks in specified areas, particularly along Stringer 1 and the fairing attachment angle. The inspections must occur before the aircraft exceeds 3000 flights or 18 months since the last inspection, whichever comes first. This directive also provides options for modification or repair that can eliminate the need for repetitive inspections, as outlined in Boeing's service bulletins and structural repair manuals. This amendment to the original directive aims to enhance safety while providing operators with more flexibility in maintaining the airworthiness of their aircraft.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, applies to the Boeing 727-200 series aircraft, line numbers 433 to 1832 inclusive, as outlined in the Airworthiness Directive AD/B727/131 Amendment 1 concerning fuselage skin cracking. The regulations mandate a detailed visual or High Frequency Eddy Current inspection for fuselage skin cracks along Stringer 1 from Body Station (BS) 1090 to BS 1110 and along the fairing attachment angle from BS 1095 to BS 1110. This requirement is in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-53A0204, and references FAA AD 91-03-19 R1. Compliance with these regulations necessitates inspecting the specified sections of the aircraft before exceeding 3000 flights or 18 months, whichever occurs sooner, since the last inspection. The inspection must then be repeated at intervals not exceeding 3000 flights or 18 months, whichever occurs sooner, unless the aircraft is modified or repaired as per the specified Boeing documentation, which then removes the requirement for repetitive inspections. This legislation operates under the Commonwealth of Australia and is administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation are AD/B727/131 Amendment 1, which applies to Boeing 727-200 series aircraft within specific line numbers. Section 1 of this Amendment requires a detailed visual or High Frequency Eddy Current inspection for fuselage skin cracks along Stringer 1 and the fairing attachment angle, as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-53A0204. This inspection must be conducted before exceeding 3000 flights or 18 months since the last inspection, and repeated at intervals not to exceed 3000 flights or 18 months. This action aims to prevent rapid decompression of the cabin by identifying and addressing any cracks in the fuselage skin.
The obligations imposed by this legislation include conducting the specified inspections at the designated intervals or upon the occurrence of certain conditions. Specifically, operators of Boeing 727-200 series aircraft must ensure that the required inspections are carried out according to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-53A0204. Additionally, if the aircraft is modified or repaired in a manner that eliminates the need for repetitive inspections, as outlined in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-53A0204 Revision 2 or Revision 3, the repetitive inspection requirement is waived. However, if the repair is made in accordance with the Boeing Structural Repair Manual, the repetitive inspection requirement remains in place.
The legislation also outlines consequences for non-compliance. While specific penalties are not stated in the text, non-compliance with airworthiness directives generally carries significant civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties may include fines and enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Criminal penalties may include imprisonment, fines, or both, depending on the severity of the breach and the discretion of the court. The exact penalties would be determined based on the specific circumstances of the case and relevant legislation.