COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Boeing 727 Series Aeroplanes
AD/B727/128
Amdt 1
Corrosion Prevention and Control Program 3/92
Applicability: All model 727.
Requirement: Action in accordance with technical requirements of FAA AD 90-25-03 Amdt 39- 6787.
Note 1: Boeing document No. D6-54929 Rev A refers.
Note 2: References made in the FAA AD text to the following; Administrator,
FAA,
FAA Principal Inspector (PI), or
Manager Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
shall be read as Civil Aviation Authority District (Airport) Office.
Note 3: Notwithstanding CAR 51B, corrosion classified as level 1 need not be reported. Level 2 corrosion may be consolidated with a sixty day report of corrective action, and submitted to the Authority District (Airport) Office under cover of a single MDR. Level 3 corrosion shall be reported by individual MDR.
Compliance: As specified in the Requirement Document. The compliance of the previous issue of this Directive is as stated in this issue. This amendment is effective from 6 March 1992.
Background: Country of Origin AD, implementation of a corrosion prevention and control program to prevent the degradation of the structural capabilities of the affected aircraft.
Amendment 1 is raised to introduce a note which specifies the reporting requirements when corrosion is found as a result of the CPCP.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, serve as a foundational framework governing civil aviation operations within the country. Specifically, Part 39 - 105 of these regulations, concerning the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, addresses the need for stringent safety measures to ensure the airworthiness of aircraft. One such directive, AD/B727/128 Amendment 1, pertains to the Boeing 727 series aeroplanes and mandates the implementation of a corrosion prevention and control program. This directive aims to mitigate the risk of structural degradation due to corrosion, thereby enhancing flight safety and extending the operational lifespan of the aircraft. The policy objective is to maintain high safety standards by ensuring that corrosion is effectively managed and reported according to specified guidelines, ultimately safeguarding the integrity of the aircraft and the safety of its occupants.
The directive was introduced to address the specific issue of corrosion in Boeing 727 series aeroplanes, ensuring compliance with technical requirements outlined by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and adapted for Australian regulatory standards. The amendment to this directive clarifies reporting procedures for different levels of corrosion found during inspections, aligning them with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's requirements. This legislative instrument is designed to provide clear, actionable guidance to operators and maintainers of Boeing 727 aircraft, ensuring that they adhere to the necessary safety protocols and report any identified corrosion issues appropriately. The enforcement of these regulations by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority aims to uphold the highest safety standards in Australia's civil aviation sector.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105, governs the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) schedule of airworthiness directives for aircraft registered in Australia. This legislation applies to all Boeing 727 series aeroplanes operating within Australian airspace. The regulations mandate adherence to technical requirements outlined in FAA AD 90-25-03 Amendment 39-6787, as referenced in Boeing document No. D6-54929 Rev A. The directive necessitates the implementation of a corrosion prevention and control program to maintain the structural integrity of the aircraft. Notably, the Act delineates different reporting procedures based on the level of corrosion detected, with Level 1 corrosion exempt from reporting, Level 2 corrosion requiring consolidated reporting within sixty days, and Level 3 corrosion necessitating individual reports submitted to the Authority District Office. These provisions ensure that all operators of Boeing 727 series aeroplanes comply with safety standards and maintain the airworthiness of their aircraft in accordance with the specified technical requirements.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39, Section 105, includes a schedule of airworthiness directives pertaining to Boeing 727 series aeroplanes. One such directive, AD/B727/128 Amendment 1, mandates a Corrosion Prevention and Control Program (CPCP) as per the technical requirements of FAA AD 90-25-03 Amendment 39-6787 (Section 3/92). This directive applies to all models within the 727 series and requires actions to be taken according to these specified technical requirements. Boeing document No. D6-54929 Rev A is referenced for further guidance. Additionally, references to certain FAA entities within the FAA AD text should be understood as referring to the Civil Aviation Authority District (Airport) Office.
The obligations imposed by this directive include the implementation of a corrosion prevention and control program to safeguard the structural integrity of the Boeing 727 aircraft. This program must align with the detailed technical requirements outlined in FAA AD 90-25-03 Amendment 39-6787. Specifically, it mandates that corrosion levels be managed and reported according to the specified hierarchy: Level 1 corrosion does not need to be reported; Level 2 corrosion can be consolidated into a single report with a 60-day corrective action plan, submitted to the Authority District (Airport) Office; and Level 3 corrosion must be reported individually through a Maintenance Discrepancy Report (MDR).
Failure to comply with the directives outlined in AD/B727/128 Amendment 1 can result in significant consequences. While the regulations do not explicitly detail specific offences or penalties within this section, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can generally lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Such actions may include fines, operational restrictions, or even the grounding of the aircraft until compliance is achieved. The severity of these consequences can vary based on the extent and impact of the non-compliance, with the potential for both civil and criminal penalties under broader aviation safety laws.