AD/B-2/20 - Increased Tail Rotor Control - Modification

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B02592 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


Brantly B-2 Series Helicopters

 

AD/B-2/20 Increased Tail Rotor Control - Modification NK

Applicability: Model B-2 prior to S/No. 112. Document:  1. Brantly SB No. 15; or

2. FAA AD 61-18-2.

 

Compliance: Forthwith.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, which were enacted to establish safety standards and procedures for civil aviation within Australia, include a schedule of airworthiness directives to ensure the safety of aircraft. The legislative instrument F2006B02592, which pertains to Brantly B-2 Series Helicopters, specifically addresses an issue with tail rotor control in certain models. This directive was introduced to address the problem of inadequate tail rotor control in Brantly B-2 helicopters, which could potentially lead to loss of control during flight. The instrument is part of the overarching regulatory framework overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), with the policy objective being to maintain the highest standards of airworthiness and ensure the safety of all civil aviation activities. This particular directive aims to ensure that affected helicopters are modified to enhance tail rotor control, thus mitigating the risk of accidents.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105 concerning the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, applies to the Brantly B-2 Series Helicopters, more precisely to those models prior to serial number 112. This directive is instrumental in ensuring that such aircraft comply with safety standards by mandating a modification to the tail rotor control system. The regulation is applicable to any person or entity operating or maintaining Brantly B-2 Series Helicopters within Australian airspace, thereby encompassing both commercial operators and private owners. This directive extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a uniform approach to airworthiness and safety across all states and territories. The requirement for compliance is immediate, necessitating that modifications be made without delay to adhere to the safety bulletins specified in Brantly Service Bulletin No. 15 or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airworthiness Directive 61-18-2. The regulation does not provide for any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within its text, although further details or exceptions might be outlined in subordinate instruments issued by CASA.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, details the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives (ADs) concerning the Brantly B-2 Series Helicopters. One such AD is AD/B-2/20, which pertains to an increased tail rotor control modification (s 39-105). This directive applies to Brantly B-2 models prior to Serial Number 112. The modification is necessary to address a critical safety concern and must be carried out in accordance with either Brantly Service Bulletin No. 15 or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) AD 61-18-2 (s 39-105). The obligations under AD/B-2/20 are clear and immediate. Operators of Brantly B-2 helicopters affected by this directive must ensure the specified modification is completed without delay. The directive mandates compliance "forthwith," indicating that the modification must be performed as soon as possible to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft (s 39-105). This requirement is intended to prevent potential safety hazards that could arise from inadequate tail rotor control. Failure to comply with AD/B-2/20 can lead to severe consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, non-compliance with an airworthiness directive can be considered an offence. The penalties for such breaches are significant, including fines and potential imprisonment. The exact penalties are not detailed within the regulations but can be severe, reflecting the seriousness of ensuring aviation safety. Additionally, failure to adhere to these directives can result in the aircraft being grounded, which can have severe operational and financial repercussions for the operators. In summary, AD/B-2/20 is a critical directive for Brantly B-2 helicopter operators to ensure the aircraft's tail rotor control is enhanced to meet safety standards. Operators must adhere to the specified modifications as outlined in the Brantly Service Bulletin or the FAA AD. Non-compliance can lead to serious legal and operational penalties, reinforcing the importance of prompt and accurate compliance with CASA's airworthiness directives.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Compliance Obligations
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.