AD/AS 355/64 Amdt 1 - Main Servocontrol Rods

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B02514 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 


AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/AS 355/64 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.


 

Eurocopter AS 355 (Twin Ecureuil) Series Helicopters

 

AD/AS 355/64

Amdt 1


Main Servocontrol Rods 7/2003 TX

 

 

Applicability: All AS 355 helicopters, versions E, F, F1, F2 and N, fitted with main and tail servocontrols listed in Table 1 and Table 2 of this Directive.

 

Table 1 - TRW-SAMM Main Servocontrols part number (P/N) SC 5083 and SC 5084 with part numbers without the suffix “V” with the following serial numbers:

 

Part Number

Serial Number

SC 5083

1500 to 1515 inclusive

SC 5084

722 to 726 inclusive.

Table 2 - Main and tail servocontrols, P/N SC5081-1, SC5082-1, SC5083, SC5084, SC5071-1 and SC5072, with part numbers without suffix "V", with the following serial numbers:

 

SC5081-1

78, 89, 227, 240, 315, 362, 427, 451,

 

452, 492, 497, 498, 506, 512,532, 550,

 

556, 561.

SC5082-1

045, 180, 194, 197, 254, 264.

SC5083

01, 03, 05, 082, 17, 21, 40, 43M, 65M,

 

77, 87, 103M, 106M, 107, 109, 128,

 

129, 138, 139, 144, 148, 152, 206, 207,

 

218, 221, 226, 235, 239, 240, 241, 243,

 

254, 256, 269, 286, 287, 290, 291, 302,

 

312, 321,325, 327, 330, 331, 334, 338,

 

339, 347M, 356M, 365, 371, 372,

 

378M, 380M, 389, 412M, 418, 423,

 

428, 439, 484M, 503, 505, 525, 526,

 

528, 529, 573M, 587, 594M, 598, 612,

 

622, 1150 to 1155, 1157, 1159 to 1169,

 

1180 to 1199, 1207, 1208, 1210 to 1259,

 

1269, 1291 to 1499.

 

Table 2 continued

 

SC5084

013, 025, 31, 75, 087, 87, 101M, 102,

105, 108, 136, 160, 162, 165M, 203,

205, 205M, 209, 220, 225, 232M,

239M, 267M, 271, 288M, 292, 300,

320, 364M, 458, 612, 627, 630, 632 to

634, 636 to 652, 654, 656 to 660, 682 to

721, 727 to 731, 733 to 756.

SC5071-1

343, 389.

SC5072

003, 35, 108, 197, 216M, 253M, 339M,

347M, 432M, 700 to 724, 726 to 744,

763 to 768, 783 to 789, 820 to 883.

Note 1: Servocontrols that have been checked or reconditioned by TRW-SAMM and are identified by a letter “V” engraved to the right of the part number on the identification plate.

Requirement: 1. Unless previously accomplished check whether any of the servocontrols listed in Table 1 and Table 2 of this Directive are installed on the aeroplane.

2.        Unless previously accomplished replace any servocontrols listed in Table 1 with servocontrols not listed in Table 1 or Table 2.

 

3.        Replace any servocontrols listed in Table 2 with servocontrols not listed in Table 1 or Table 2.

 

4.        Do not install any servocontrols listed in Table 1 or Table 2 of this Directive.

Note 2: DGAC AD 2003-100(A) refers.

Compliance: 1. Before further flight.

 

2.        Before further flight.

 

3.        Within 550 flight hours or 24 months, whichever occurs first, after the effective date of this Directive.

4.        From the effective date of this directive.

 

This Amendment becomes effective on 9 May 2003.

 

Background: This Directive was prompted by advice that a manufacturing defect has been detected in a batch of rods of the main servocontrol. Failure of the rod will lead to loss of control of the helicopter. This amendment is prompted by additional defects being discovered in servocontrols with additional part numbers and serial numbers.

This original issue of this Directive became effective 3 December 2001.


Jim Coyne

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 6 May 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 9 May 2003.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) issued Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/AS 355/64 Amendment 1 in 2003, addressing the safety concerns related to the Eurocopter AS 355 (Twin Ecureuil) Series Helicopters. The directive was enacted to address a manufacturing defect in specific main servocontrol rods, which could lead to loss of control. CASA revoked the previous directive AD/AS 355/64 and issued this amendment to include additional servocontrols with identified defects. The directive applies to all AS 355 helicopters of specific versions that are equipped with the affected servocontrols, listed in Tables 1 and 2 of the directive. The policy objective is to ensure the safe operation of these helicopters by mandating the replacement or avoidance of installation of the defective servocontrols. Compliance with the directive is required before further flight, with specific timelines for replacement based on flight hours or time since the directive's effective date.

Scope and Application

The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 applies specifically to all Eurocopter AS 355 helicopter models E, F, F1, F2, and N that are fitted with specific main and tail servocontrols. These include TRW-SAMM main servocontrols with part numbers SC 5083 and SC 5084 without the suffix “V,” as well as other part numbers listed in Table 1 and Table 2 of the Directive, with specific serial numbers. The directive mandates that certain actions be taken to address identified unsafe conditions, such as checking and replacing specific servocontrols, and prohibiting the installation of certain parts. The requirements must be met before further flight, within specified time frames, or immediately upon the directive's effective date. The AD applies nationally within Australia and is enforceable by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which oversees compliance with aviation safety regulations. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in this directive, and compliance is mandatory for all affected aircraft and operators.

Key Provisions

The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1(1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) specifically targets the Eurocopter AS 355 (Twin Ecureuil) Series Helicopters, focusing on main servocontrol rods. It applies to all AS 355 helicopters, versions E, F, F1, F2, and N, equipped with specific main and tail servocontrols listed in Table 1 and Table 2 of the directive (sections 1 and 2). The directive mandates that specific servocontrols, identified by particular part numbers and serial numbers, must either be checked, replaced, or not installed at all to prevent unsafe conditions (sections 3 and 4). The AD imposes several obligations on the parties governed by it. First, operators must verify whether any of the specified servocontrols are installed on their aircraft (section 1). If they are, operators must replace them with servocontrols that are not listed in Table 1 or Table 2 (sections 2 and 3). Additionally, operators must refrain from installing any servocontrols listed in the directive (section 4). These actions must be taken before further flight and within specific timeframes depending on the requirement (section 5). Failure to comply with the AD may result in serious safety hazards, including potential loss of control of the helicopter. The AD does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for non-compliance within the text. However, non-compliance with CASR 1998 generally can lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), including fines, suspension of certificates, or other regulatory actions. The severity of penalties would depend on the specific circumstances and the extent of non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.