AD/AS 355/42 - Lucas Air Equipment Hoist - Explosive Squib

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B02496 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


Eurocopter AS 355 (Twin Ecureuil) Series Helicopters

 

AD/AS 355/42 Lucas Air Equipment Hoist - Explosive Squib 3/93

Applicability: All Twin Ecureuil Dauphin series helicopters, listed in the Requirement Document, fitted with Lucas Air Equipment hoist part number 76370 (all types) with serial numbers up to and including 494.

 

Requirement: Action in accordance with Eurocopter France AS 355 Service Bulletin No 25.34.

 

Compliance: Installed Hoists - Prior to the first hoisting mission after 4 March 1993, where a pyrotechnic squib is installed, but no later than 30 April 1993.

 

Spare Hoists - Prior to installation.

 

Background:  Eurocopter have advised that the possibility exists that the hoist squib may be incorrectly connected. Compliance with this Directive is necessary to ensure that the pyrotechnic squib will fire correctly when required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, as amended, is an essential piece of Australian legislation designed to maintain safety and operational standards within the aviation industry. Specifically, Part 39 - 105 Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives encompasses various safety mandates to ensure that aircraft remain airworthy. One such directive is AD/AS 355/42, which addresses a critical safety concern with the Eurocopter AS 355 (Twin Ecureuil) series helicopters. This directive was enacted to address the potential risk of an explosive squib in the Lucas Air Equipment hoist becoming incorrectly connected, which could lead to operational failures. The policy objective of this directive is to ensure that the pyrotechnic squib will function correctly when required, thereby enhancing the safety and reliability of the aircraft during hoisting missions. This legislative instrument was enacted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which operates under the authority of the Australian Parliament. The directive mandates specific actions to be taken on the affected helicopters, requiring compliance by a specified date to mitigate the identified safety risk. The directive applies to all Twin Ecureuil Dauphin series helicopters fitted with the specified Lucas Air Equipment hoist part number 76370 and mandates adherence to Eurocopter France AS 355 Service Bulletin No 25.34 to ensure that the pyrotechnic squib operates correctly. By implementing these measures, the legislation aims to prevent potential hazards and maintain the highest standards of aviation safety.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically within Part 39 - 105, pertains to airworthiness directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure the safety and airworthiness of aircraft. In this instance, the regulation AD/AS 355/42 concerns the Eurocopter AS 355 (Twin Ecureuil) series helicopters. The directive applies to all Twin Ecureuil Dauphin series helicopters equipped with a Lucas Air Equipment hoist part number 76370, inclusive of serial numbers up to and including 494. The directive mandates compliance with Eurocopter France AS 355 Service Bulletin No 25.34 to address the risk of an incorrectly connected pyrotechnic squib in the hoist system, which could affect the proper functioning of the hoist during operations. This requirement necessitates that installed hoists be actioned prior to the first hoisting mission after 4 March 1993, but no later than 30 April 1993, while spare hoists must be addressed before installation. The regulation applies nationwide within the Commonwealth of Australia and ensures that these safety measures are implemented to maintain the integrity of the hoisting equipment in the specified helicopter models.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, include a schedule of airworthiness directives that mandate certain actions for the maintenance and operation of aircraft. In this case, Airworthiness Directive AD/AS 355/42 pertains to Eurocopter AS 355 (Twin Ecureuil) Series Helicopters (section 1). The directive requires compliance with Eurocopter France AS 355 Service Bulletin No 25.34, which addresses an issue with the Lucas Air Equipment hoist part number 76370 (section 2). The directive applies to all Twin Ecureuil Dauphin series helicopters fitted with the specified hoist part number and serial numbers up to and including 494 (section 3). The directive mandates that the pyrotechnic squib must be correctly connected to ensure proper functioning during hoisting operations. Specifically, installed hoists must comply with the directive before the first hoisting mission after 4 March 1993, but no later than 30 April 1993, while spare hoists must comply before they are installed (section 4). The obligations imposed by this directive are primarily on helicopter operators and maintenance personnel. They must ensure that all installed hoists conform to the requirements set out in the directive by the specified date (section 5). Operators must verify that the pyrotechnic squib is correctly connected before any hoisting mission takes place. Additionally, maintenance personnel must inspect and ensure that any spare hoists are compliant with the directive before they are installed on the helicopter (section 6). Compliance with these requirements is critical to ensure the safety and airworthiness of the helicopter during hoisting operations. Failure to comply with Airworthiness Directive AD/AS 355/42 may result in serious safety risks, including the potential for the hoist squib to malfunction during operation, which could lead to equipment failure or other hazards (section 7). While the regulations do not explicitly state civil or criminal penalties for non-compliance with this specific directive, non-compliance with airworthiness directives generally can lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). These actions may include grounding of the aircraft, fines, or other regulatory sanctions (section 8). The exact penalties would depend on the severity of the non-compliance and could potentially include significant financial penalties and legal consequences for the operators and maintenance personnel responsible for ensuring compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations
Prohibited Conduct
Catchwords
Airworthiness Directives

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.