COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 106 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Turbomeca Turbine Engines - Artouste Series
AD/ARTOUSTE/5 Reduction Gear Driving Pinion NK
Bearings Replacement
Applicability: All Artouste 111B.
Document: 1. Turbomeca Service No. 73.218.0022; or
2. AD/TURB-T/3.
Compliance: As detailed in the Requirement Document.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, amended through legislative instruments such as F2006B02466, are integral to ensuring the safety and operational efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. This legislative instrument, introduced by the Commonwealth of Australia and enacted by the relevant authority, targets specific safety concerns associated with Turbomeca turbine engines, particularly the Artouste Series. The problem it addresses is the necessity for rigorous maintenance and compliance protocols to mitigate risks associated with the reduction gear driving pinion bearings in these engines. The policy objective, as stated within the legislative framework, is to enhance aviation safety by enforcing stringent airworthiness directives that ensure all applicable aircraft meet the required safety standards. This is achieved through the implementation of specific directives, such as AD/ARTOUSTE/5, which mandate the replacement of bearings to prevent mechanical failures and enhance overall flight safety.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, specifically AD/ARTOUSTE/5 concerning the Turbomeca Turbine Engines - Artouste Series, applies to all Artouste 111B engines. This directive mandates the replacement of the reduction gear driving pinion NK bearings, ensuring compliance with detailed requirements as outlined in the corresponding Requirement Document, which may include Turbomeca Service No. 73.218.0022 or AD/TURB-T/3. The application of this directive is overseen by the Commonwealth of Australia under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically within Part 39 - 106. It is pertinent to note that this regulation extends to all operators or entities that possess or utilise Artouste 111B engines within Australian jurisdiction. There are no exclusions or exemptions explicitly stated within this directive, implying that all relevant engines must adhere to the stipulated compliance measures. The scope of the directive is further extended through subordinate instruments that may provide additional specifications or clarifications.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically in Part 39 - 106, detail the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives for the Turbomeca Turbine Engines of the Artouste series (section 39-106). This part includes an Airworthiness Directive (AD) numbered AD/ARTOUSTE/5, which mandates the replacement of bearings in the reduction gear driving pinion of the NK bearing (section 39-106(1)). This directive applies to all Artouste 111B engines and is referenced by Turbomeca Service No. 73.218.0022 or AD/TURB-T/3 (section 39-106(2)).
The obligations imposed by this directive require the operators and owners of Artouste 111B engines to ensure compliance with the detailed requirements as specified in the Requirement Document. This means that the relevant parties must follow the procedures and timelines provided to replace the bearings in the specified component of the engine. Failure to adhere to these specifications could result in the engine not meeting the required airworthiness standards, which could lead to operational restrictions or grounding of the aircraft.
Failure to comply with the AD/ARTOUSTE/5 could result in civil and possibly criminal consequences. Civil penalties may include fines and potential enforcement actions by CASA. While the specific maximum penalties are not detailed in the extract, such penalties can be significant, reflecting the importance of maintaining airworthiness standards in aviation. Furthermore, non-compliance could result in criminal charges if the failure to comply is deemed to have caused or contributed to an aviation accident or incident, potentially leading to more severe penalties, including imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach and its consequences.