COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Avro Anson and Avro 19 Series Aeroplanes
AD/ANSON/16
Amdt 1
Fuselage and Fin Structure - Inspection 11/67
Applicability: Anson and Avro 19.
Document: Avro TSB No. 80 paragraphs 1.1 to 1.8. Compliance: At intervals not exceeding 100 hours time in service.
S
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, was enacted to maintain high safety standards within the civil aviation sector in Australia. It was introduced to address the need for consistent and stringent regulations governing the airworthiness of aircraft, particularly in light of the rapid advancements in aviation technology and increasing air traffic. This legislation is administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is tasked with ensuring that all civil aircraft operating within Australian airspace meet the necessary safety standards. The policy objective underpinning this regulation is to minimise the risk of accidents by requiring regular and rigorous inspections and maintenance of critical aircraft components. This is evident in Airworthiness Directives such as AD/ANSON/16Amdt 1, which mandates specific inspections of the fuselage and fin structure of Anson and Avro 19 series aeroplanes at intervals not exceeding 100 hours of time in service.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, specifically AD/ANSON/16 Amendment 1, pertains to the inspection of the fuselage and fin structure of Avro Anson and Avro 19 series aeroplanes. This directive applies to the aforementioned aircraft types, requiring inspections at intervals not exceeding 100 hours of time in service, as stipulated in Avro Technical Standard Order (TSB) No. 80, paragraphs 1.1 to 1.8. The legislation operates under the overarching framework of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, which are applicable throughout the Commonwealth of Australia. This regulation ensures that all operators of Avro Anson and Avro 19 aeroplanes within the Australian jurisdiction must adhere to the specified inspection intervals to maintain the airworthiness of these aircraft. The directive does not explicitly mention any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, thus applying uniformly across all operators within the national jurisdiction. The scope of the directive is further extended and refined through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional operational details or clarifications necessary for compliance.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, contains detailed provisions regarding airworthiness directives for various aircraft, including the Avro Anson and Avro 19 series aeroplanes. Section AD/ANSON/16Amdt 1 pertains to the inspection of the fuselage and fin structure of these aeroplanes. According to this directive, the inspection must occur at intervals not exceeding 100 hours of time in service (1). The applicable document for compliance is Avro Technical Standard Order (TSB) No. 80, paragraphs 1.1 to 1.8 (2).
The obligations imposed by this directive are clear and precise. Operators of the Avro Anson and Avro 19 series aeroplanes must ensure that the fuselage and fin structures are inspected in accordance with the specified intervals. These inspections are critical to maintaining the airworthiness of the aircraft and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. The specific guidelines set out in Avro TSB No. 80 must be followed meticulously to meet compliance requirements.
Failure to adhere to the inspection intervals and guidelines outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can result in serious consequences. The legislation does not explicitly state the penalties for non-compliance within the provided text, but generally, breaches of airworthiness directives can lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). These actions may include fines, suspension or revocation of aircraft certificates of airworthiness, and potential criminal charges against the operators or responsible personnel. The severity of penalties may vary based on the nature and extent of the breach, but the overarching goal is to enforce strict adherence to safety standards to prevent accidents and ensure public safety.