AD/AMD 20/13 - Fire Extinguisher Bottle Squib

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B02351 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

 


AMD Fan Jet Falcon (Falcon 20/Mystere-Falcon 200) Series Aeroplanes

 

AD/AMD 20/13 Fire Extinguisher Bottle Squib 7/77

Applicability: All models.

 

Requirement: Action in accordance with AMD Service Newsflash No. 81.

 

Note: Bureau Veritas AD 77-77 (B) refers.

 

Compliance: Before 1 October 1977.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), were enacted to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. Among the many directives under this regulation, Part 39 - 105 specifically addresses the airworthiness of aircraft through various airworthiness directives (ADs). One such AD, AD/AMD 20/13, pertains to the Falcon (Falcon 20/Mystere-Falcon 200) series aeroplanes, focusing on the requirement to address issues with fire extinguisher bottle squibs as outlined in AMD Service Newsflash No. 81. This directive mandates compliance before 1 October 1977, ensuring that all affected aircraft meet the necessary safety standards to mitigate risks associated with fire extinguisher bottle failures. The policy objective of these regulations is to maintain and enhance the safety of civil aviation operations in Australia.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, which pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, applies to all models within the Fan Jet Falcon (Falcon 20/Mystere-Falcon 200) series aeroplanes. This regulation mandates that all relevant parties must adhere to the action stipulated in AMD Service Newsflash No. 81 concerning fire extinguisher bottle squib issues. The requirement to comply with this directive must be met before 1 October 1977, as referenced by Bureau Veritas AD 77-77 (B). The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this regulation is national, governed under the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring uniform safety standards across all states and territories. This legislation does not specify exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, but the broad applicability of the directive ensures that all entities involved in the operation of the mentioned aircraft models must comply with the safety measures outlined.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39, section 105, mandate the safety requirements for airworthiness directives, focusing on the AMD Fan Jet Falcon (Falcon 20/Mystere-Falcon 200) series aeroplanes. Section AD/AMD 20/13 details the directive related to fire extinguisher bottle squib, which applies to all models within this series. According to the regulation, operators must take action as outlined in AMD Service Newsflash No. 81, with a particular reference to Bureau Veritas AD 77-77 (B). The compliance deadline for these requirements is set before 1 October 1977. The obligations imposed by this regulation necessitate that operators of AMD Fan Jet Falcon aeroplanes ensure adherence to the specified airworthiness directives. This includes the implementation of any necessary actions related to the fire extinguisher bottle squib, as indicated in the AMD Service Newsflash No. 81, to maintain the safety and airworthiness of the aircraft. The regulation underscores the importance of referencing Bureau Veritas AD 77-77 (B) to ensure compliance with the safety standards required by the Civil Aviation Regulations. Failure to comply with the provisions outlined in AD/AMD 20/13 may result in serious consequences. While specific penalties are not detailed in the provided text, it is evident that non-compliance with airworthiness directives can lead to severe legal repercussions. Operators found in breach of these regulations could face penalties under civil aviation laws, which might include fines or, more critically, grounding of the aircraft until the required actions are taken. This underscores the importance of timely and accurate compliance with the specified directives to avoid any adverse outcomes.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.