COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Aermacchi - Lockheed AL 60 Series Aeroplanes
AD/AL 60/2 Air Throttle/Waste Gate Coordinator - Modification 6/63
Applicability: All models equipped with Continental TSIO-470-B engine. Document: Aermacchi Lockheed 60 Mod. Bulletin No. 2.
Compliance: Before 1 September 1971.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES, address the need for maintaining and ensuring the safety of aircraft within Australia. This legislative instrument is a part of the broader framework that seeks to safeguard the public by ensuring that all aircraft meet stringent safety standards. The Air Throttle/Waste Gate Coordinator Modification for Aermacchi-Lockheed AL 60 Series Aeroplanes, detailed in AD/AL 60/2, is a directive designed to address potential safety concerns with specific engine models, particularly those equipped with Continental TSIO-470-B engines. This modification was introduced to ensure compliance with safety standards before a specified date, in this case, 1 September 1971. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority, acting under the authority granted by the Parliament, aims to maintain and enhance the safety of civil aviation through such detailed and targeted directives.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105 and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, pertains to the Aermacchi - Lockheed AL 60 Series aeroplanes. This legislation applies to all models of the AL 60 series that are equipped with a Continental TSIO-470-B engine. The directive mandates compliance with Air Throttle/Waste Gate Coordinator modifications as outlined in the Aermacchi Lockheed 60 Mod. Bulletin No. 2 and requires that these modifications be completed before 1 September 1971. The regulation enforces stringent airworthiness standards across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring that all relevant aircraft meet the specified safety requirements to maintain operational approval. This legislation does not explicitly state any exclusions or exemptions, but it is subject to interpretation and further elaboration through subordinate instruments which may define additional operational details or exceptions.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105, include a Schedule of Airworthiness Directives that pertain to various aircraft types, including the Aermacchi-Lockheed AL 60 Series aeroplanes. Section AD/AL 60/2 pertains to the modification of the air throttle/waste gate coordinator on aeroplanes equipped with the Continental TSIO-470-B engine. This directive is critical as it aims to address specific safety concerns related to the operation of the engine, ensuring that all affected aircraft meet the required airworthiness standards.
These regulations impose a clear requirement on aircraft operators and maintenance providers to comply with the modifications outlined in the Aermacchi Lockheed 60 Modification Bulletin No. 2. This compliance must be achieved before 1 September 1971, establishing a specific deadline for implementation. Failure to adhere to these modifications could potentially compromise the safety of the aircraft, leading to severe operational and legal repercussions.
The obligations set forth in these regulations are stringent, mandating that the air throttle/waste gate coordinator modifications are carried out correctly and in a timely manner. Operators and maintenance personnel must ensure that the modifications are fully implemented before the specified date, with documentation proving compliance being a necessary part of the process. This requirement underscores the importance of maintaining high safety standards in civil aviation, particularly concerning engine performance and airworthiness.
In the event of non-compliance, the consequences can be significant. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 establish potential penalties for those who fail to adhere to these airworthiness directives. While the exact penalties are not specified in the provided text, it is evident that breaches could result in both civil and criminal liabilities. Such breaches might include fines, suspension of operational licenses, and other enforcement actions to ensure adherence to safety regulations. The severity of these penalties highlights the critical nature of the modifications and the importance of strict compliance to maintain safety in the aviation industry.