COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Aermacchi - Lockheed AL 60 Series Aeroplanes
AD/AL 60/1 Air Throttle Duct - Fuel Pressure Gauge
Additional Line - Modification Applicability: All models equipped with Continental TSIO-470-B engine. Document: Aermacchi Lockheed 60 Mod. Bulletin No. 1.
Compliance: Before 1 September 1971.
6/63
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, form a comprehensive legal framework governing civil aviation operations within the country. This legislation is designed to ensure the safety and efficiency of the nation's civil aviation industry. One particular aspect of this regulation is Part 39, which includes specific directives related to the airworthiness of various aircraft models. For instance, the Airworthiness Directive AD/AL 60/1 pertains to the Aermacchi Lockheed AL 60 series aeroplanes, specifically addressing the air throttle duct and fuel pressure gauge. This directive aims to enhance safety by mandating modifications on aeroplanes equipped with the Continental TSIO-470-B engine, ensuring compliance before a specified date, in this case, 1 September 1971. The policy objective is clearly to maintain and improve the safety standards of civil aviation by enforcing necessary modifications on aircraft that meet the criteria outlined in the directive.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, under the authority of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), apply to all individuals and entities involved in civil aviation operations within Australian airspace, including aircraft operators, maintenance personnel, and aviation service providers. Specifically, the Airworthiness Directive AD/AL 60/1 pertains to Aermacchi-Lockheed AL 60 Series aeroplanes equipped with Continental TSIO-470-B engines, mandating modifications to the air throttle duct and fuel pressure gauge to ensure safety standards are met. This regulation applies to all affected aircraft regardless of their location within Australia, ensuring a uniform approach to aviation safety across the nation. Notably, compliance is required for aircraft that were in service before 1 September 1971, as stipulated in Aermacchi Lockheed 60 Model Bulletin No. 1. The application of this directive can be extended or clarified through subordinate instruments issued by CASA, ensuring that all stakeholders are aware of their obligations and the safety measures that must be implemented.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically under Part 39 - 105, outline the requirements for the airworthiness of the Aermacchi - Lockheed AL 60 Series Aeroplanes, particularly focusing on the air throttle duct and fuel pressure gauge in models equipped with the Continental TSIO-470-B engine (section 39 - 105). The legislation mandates that modifications be made to the air throttle duct and the installation of an additional line to enhance safety and functionality. Compliance with these directives is crucial and must be achieved before 1 September 1971, as specified in Aermacchi Lockheed 60 Mod. Bulletin No. 1 (section 39 - 105).
Under this Act, the primary obligation is to ensure that all modifications concerning the air throttle duct and the installation of the additional line are completed according to the specified guidelines. This includes adhering to the technical details provided in the aforementioned bulletin to guarantee that the aircraft maintains its airworthiness. Owners, operators, and maintenance personnel must verify that these modifications are made by certified technicians and that all necessary documentation is completed and retained for compliance verification (section 39 - 105).
The Act imposes strict penalties for non-compliance with these airworthiness directives. Any person or entity failing to adhere to the modifications specified in section 39 - 105 could face significant consequences. These may include fines, potential grounding of the aircraft until compliance is achieved, and in severe cases, criminal charges. The exact penalties can vary but may include fines up to $126,000 for corporations and lesser amounts for individuals, reflecting the serious nature of ensuring air safety (section 39 - 105). Additionally, non-compliance can lead to legal actions, which could further impact the operational status of the aircraft and the reputation of the operators involved.