COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Ayres Thrush (Snow) Commander Series Aeroplanes
AD/AC-SNOW/2 Agricultural Equipment Boom Support - Modification
Applicability: Model S-2C and S-2D S/Nos. 1254 to 1349. Document: Aero Commander - Olney Division SL No. 41. Compliance: Forthwith.
8/66
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, addresses the need for maintaining airworthiness standards in the aviation sector by introducing directives that ensure aircraft meet safety requirements. Enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, these regulations aim to maintain and improve the safety and efficiency of civil aviation. The policy objective behind these regulations is to provide a framework for the safe operation of aircraft by setting out standards and procedures that must be followed by aircraft manufacturers, operators, and maintenance personnel. This legislative instrument, AD/AC-SNOW/2, pertains to the modification of agricultural equipment boom support in Ayres Thrush (Snow) Commander Series Aeroplanes, specifically for model S-2C and S-2D with serial numbers ranging from 1254 to 1349. Compliance with these directives is required immediately, as indicated by the compliance directive "Forthwith" from the date of the directive, 8/66.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives, with a focus on Ayres Thrush (Snow) Commander Series Aeroplanes, particularly model S-2C and S-2D with serial numbers ranging from 1254 to 1349. This legislation mandates modifications to the agricultural equipment boom support for the specified aircraft models to ensure compliance with airworthiness standards. The directive, AD/AC-SNOW/2, is issued under the authority of Aero Commander - Olney Division SL No. 41, and compliance is required forthwith. The regulation applies nationally across Australia and is overseen by CASA, which has the jurisdiction to enforce these safety measures. The scope is limited to the specified aircraft models and serial numbers, with no stated exclusions or exemptions within the directive itself, though broader regulations may apply. Subordinate instruments may further define the specifics of compliance and enforcement.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (Cth), under Part 39 - 105, specifically address the airworthiness directives for Ayres Thrush (Snow) Commander Series Aeroplanes. The applicable legislation in this context is AD/AC-SNOW/2, which pertains to the agricultural equipment boom support modification for Model S-2C and S-2D aircraft with serial numbers (S/Nos.) ranging from 1254 to 1349. This directive is documented in Aero Commander - Olney Division, Service Letter No. 41. The directive mandates that compliance must be achieved forthwith, as stated in the directive dated 8/66.
Under this legislation, the obligations imposed on the parties or entities governed are primarily centred on ensuring the airworthiness of the specified aircraft models. This entails adherence to the modification guidelines outlined in the Aero Commander - Olney Division SL No. 41, which is essential for maintaining the safety and operational integrity of the Ayres Thrush aeroplanes in question. The directive specifically requires the implementation of the prescribed modifications to the agricultural equipment boom support without delay.
Failure to comply with the airworthiness directives as specified in AD/AC-SNOW/2 could result in significant consequences. While the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 do not explicitly detail the penalties for non-compliance in this specific context, breaches of airworthiness directives are generally treated with seriousness due to their implications for flight safety. The potential outcomes of non-compliance could include civil penalties, operational restrictions, or even criminal charges if the breach results in harm or endangers public safety. The exact penalties would be determined based on the severity of the breach and the applicable regulations governing civil aviation safety.