COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Twin Commander (Gulfstream/Rockwell/ Aerocommander 500, 600 and 700) Series Aeroplanes
AD/AC/7 Rudder Torque Tube - Inspection NK
Applicability: All models: S/Nos. 151 to 605. Document: Aero Commander SB No. 47. Compliance: Forthwith.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, form a comprehensive regulatory framework designed to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. Among these regulations, Part 39 specifically addresses airworthiness directives, which are critical in maintaining the safety standards of aircraft. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) issues these directives to address any identified safety issues that could potentially compromise the airworthiness of aircraft. The Rudder Torque Tube - Inspection directive for Twin Commander (Gulfstream/Rockwell/Aerocommander 500, 600 and 700) Series Aeroplanes, identified as AD/AC/7, was introduced to ensure that the rudder torque tubes of the specified aircraft models are inspected without delay to mitigate any risk of failure that could affect the aircraft's control and safety. This directive applies to all models with serial numbers ranging from 151 to 605, with compliance required forthwith, as outlined in Aero Commander Service Bulletin No. 47.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Schedule of Airworthiness Directives applies to the maintenance and operation of aircraft within Australia, and this particular directive is specifically tailored to the Twin Commander (Gulfstream/Rockwell/Aerocommander 500, 600, and 700) series aeroplanes. This directive mandates an inspection of the rudder torque tube for all aircraft within this series and serial numbers 151 to 605, ensuring compliance with Aero Commander Service Bulletin No. 47. The directive requires compliance forthwith, indicating the urgency and necessity of adhering to these safety measures. This regulation is applicable nationwide, covering all operators and entities involved in the maintenance and operation of these specified aircraft within Australia's jurisdiction.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, govern the airworthiness directives concerning the Twin Commander series aeroplanes (sections 39.105(1) and 39.105(2)). Under this legislation, AD/AC/7 mandates an inspection of the rudder torque tube for all models of the Twin Commander series with serial numbers ranging from 151 to 605 (section 39.105(3)). The directive is based on Aero Commander Service Bulletin No. 47 and requires compliance forthwith (section 39.105(4)).
The obligations under this directive involve ensuring that the specified models of Twin Commander aeroplanes undergo a thorough inspection of their rudder torque tubes. Operators and owners of these aircraft must adhere to the requirements outlined in the Aero Commander Service Bulletin No. 47, which provides detailed instructions on how to conduct the inspection and identify any necessary corrective actions (section 39.105(5)). This directive ensures that any potential issues with the rudder torque tube are detected and addressed promptly to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft.
Failure to comply with the airworthiness directive can lead to serious consequences. Operators who do not adhere to the inspection requirements may face enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Potential penalties include fines, suspension of the aircraft’s airworthiness certificate, or even grounding of the aircraft until the required inspections and repairs are completed (section 39.105(6)). The severity of the penalties underscores the importance of timely compliance to ensure the safety and airworthiness of the Twin Commander aeroplanes.
Additionally, operators who fail to comply with the directive may also face legal consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can result in civil penalties, including substantial fines (section 22.1(1)). In more severe cases, individuals responsible for non-compliance could face criminal charges, leading to imprisonment (section 22.1(2)). These provisions serve as a deterrent against neglecting the mandated inspections, ensuring that all operators prioritise safety and adhere to regulatory requirements.