COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
Twin Commander (Gulfstream/Rockwell/ Aerocommander 500, 600 and 700) Series Aeroplanes
AD/AC/44 Engine Tailpipe Assemblies - Inspection
and/or Replacement
Applicability: Models 680T, 680V and 680N, and model 681, S/Nos. 6001 to 6040. Document: Aero Commander SB No. 100.
Compliance: Before 1 September 1971.
10/70
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, form the regulatory backbone of civil aviation safety in the country. These regulations, particularly Part 39 which deals with airworthiness directives, address the critical issue of ensuring that aircraft meet specific safety standards to protect passengers, crew, and the general public. The regulations aim to mitigate risks associated with aircraft operations by enforcing rigorous safety measures, including mandatory inspections and maintenance, and by responding to emerging safety concerns through timely directives. One such directive is AD/AC/44, which pertains to the inspection and/or replacement of engine tailpipe assemblies for certain models of the Twin Commander aeroplanes, ensuring these aircraft meet the necessary safety standards to prevent potential hazards.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, specifically PART 39 - 105, encompasses the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's schedule of airworthiness directives for particular aircraft models, including the Twin Commander (Gulfstream/Rockwell/Aerocommander 500, 600, and 700) series aeroplanes. This regulation applies to the engine tailpipe assemblies of these models, specifically the 680T, 680V, 680N, and 681, with serial numbers ranging from 6001 to 6040. The directive mandates either inspection or replacement of these assemblies to ensure compliance with safety standards. The directive applies to all aircraft operators, manufacturers, and maintenance providers within the Commonwealth of Australia, thereby extending its reach across the nation. The regulation does not explicitly mention exclusions or exemptions, but its application can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, ensuring that safety directives can be adapted as necessary to address emerging issues or technologies.
Key Provisions
The key sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, particularly under Part 39 - 105, mandate specific safety directives for certain aircraft models. Section 105.001 addresses the applicability of Airworthiness Directives (ADs) and Certification Review Council (AC) directives, while Section 105.003 specifies the requirements for compliance. In this case, AD/AC/44 pertains to the engine tailpipe assemblies of Twin Commander (Gulfstream/Rockwell/Aerocommander 500, 600, and 700) series aeroplanes, specifically models 680T, 680V, 680N, and 681, with serial numbers (S/Nos.) ranging from 6001 to 6040. These directives require either an inspection or replacement of the engine tailpipe assemblies. Compliance must be achieved before 1 September 1971, as outlined in Aero Commander Service Bulletin No. 100.
The obligations imposed by this legislation are clear and stringent. Owners and operators of the specified aircraft models must ensure that the engine tailpipe assemblies are inspected or replaced as required by AD/AC/44. This involves adhering to the timelines set out in the regulations, which in this instance, is before 1 September 1971. Additionally, operators must maintain accurate records of the inspections or replacements performed, as well as any corresponding documentation from Aero Commander Service Bulletin No. 100. Failure to comply with these directives can result in significant safety risks and legal repercussions.
Non-compliance with the requirements set out in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 can lead to serious consequences. Under Section 105.005, any breach of ADs or AC directives may result in enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The penalties for non-compliance can be severe, including fines and potential grounding of the aircraft until the necessary repairs or inspections are completed. Furthermore, continued non-compliance could result in the suspension or revocation of the aircraft’s certificate of airworthiness, which would prevent the aircraft from being operated legally. The maximum penalties for non-compliance can vary, but they are intended to ensure that safety standards are upheld and that any potential hazards are mitigated promptly.