COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
Airbus Industrie A330 Series Aeroplanes
AD/A330/18 Forward Fuselage Frame 12A Stiffener 8/2003
Applicability: All Model A330 aircraft, except for aircraft with Airbus Modification 49694 incorporated in production or Airbus Service Bulletin (SB) A330-53-3130 incorporated in-service.
Requirement: 1. Perform a high frequency eddy current inspection of the stiffener fitting, left hand and right hand sides of frame 12A of the forward fuselage, in accordance with SB A330-53-3135.
If cracks are detected, accomplish the corrective actions described in the flow chart of SB A330-53-3135, which defines the required compliance time according to the length of detected cracks.
2. If no cracks are detected, repeat the Requirement 1 inspection.
Note: DGAC AD 2003-205(B) refers.
Compliance: 1. Before the accumulation of 13,000 flight cycles.
2. At intervals not to exceed 10,000 flight cycles.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 7 August 2003.
Background: During a scheduled inspection, cracks were detected in the frame 12A stiffener upper attachment fitting on the floor beam, left hand and right hand sides of the fuselage.
Investigation revealed that the cause of cracking was the high level of fatigue of the fitting due to longitudinal forces. The combined effect of cabin pressurisation and bending induced by thermal effects led to a longitudinal force in the floor beam.
David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 17 June 2003
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 16 July 2003.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as part of the broader legislative framework overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), introduced a structured approach to ensuring aircraft safety across Australia. Specifically, the Airworthiness Directive issued under subregulation 39.1(1) of the CASR 1998 addresses the identified safety concerns with Airbus Industrie A330 Series Aeroplanes. This directive, AD/A330/18, was enacted to address the issue of cracks in the forward fuselage frame 12A stiffener, which was found during routine inspections. The directive mandates specific inspection and corrective actions to mitigate the risk of structural failure due to high levels of fatigue, thereby enhancing the overall safety and airworthiness of the affected aircraft. The directive became effective on 7 August 2003, aiming to ensure compliance before the aircraft accumulates 13,000 flight cycles and subsequently at intervals not exceeding 10,000 flight cycles.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended and administered by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), impose comprehensive safety regulations on the aviation industry across Australia. Specifically, Part 39, which includes the Airworthiness Directives, applies to all aircraft and aeronautical products operating in Australia, mandating compliance with safety standards and corrective actions to mitigate risks. This particular Airworthiness Directive (AD/A330/18) applies to all Airbus Industrie A330 series aeroplanes except those with certain modifications or service bulletins already addressing the identified safety issue. The directive requires operators to perform high-frequency eddy current inspections of the forward fuselage frame 12A stiffener and take corrective actions if any cracks are detected. The inspections must occur before the aircraft accumulates 13,000 flight cycles and at intervals not exceeding 10,000 flight cycles thereafter. The directive is effective as of 7 August 2003 and was notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 16 July 2003.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), specifically Part 39 - 105, outlines an Airworthiness Directive (AD) concerning Airbus Industrie A330 Series Aeroplanes. This AD, numbered AD/A330/18, pertains to the Forward Fuselage Frame 12A Stiffener, issued in August 2003. The directive applies to all Model A330 aircraft, except those that have incorporated Airbus Modification 49694 or Airbus Service Bulletin (SB) A330-53-3130. The directive mandates that an inspection must be performed on the stiffener fitting, specifically on the left-hand and right-hand sides of frame 12A of the forward fuselage, using a high-frequency eddy current inspection method as outlined in SB A330-53-3135. If cracks are detected, corrective actions must be taken according to the flow chart in SB A330-53-3135, with compliance times varying based on the length of the detected cracks. If no cracks are detected, the inspection must be repeated.
The AD imposes specific obligations on the parties or entities it governs. These obligations include performing the high-frequency eddy current inspection on the stiffener fittings of the A330 aircraft within the specified timeframes. Specifically, the inspection must be completed before the aircraft accumulates 13,000 flight cycles and subsequently at intervals not exceeding 10,000 flight cycles. The directive ensures that any detected issues are addressed promptly to maintain the airworthiness and safety of the aircraft. Compliance with the AD is crucial for ensuring the structural integrity of the affected aircraft components.
Failure to comply with the requirements of this Airworthiness Directive can result in significant consequences. Under CASR 1998, non-compliance with ADs is an offence, and penalties may include fines and imprisonment. The specific maximum penalties are not detailed in the AD itself but are governed by the broader legislative framework of the CASR 1998, which includes provisions for enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The severity of the penalties underscores the importance of adhering to the AD to ensure the safety and airworthiness of the affected aircraft.