CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998
ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.
The French DGAC has issued AD F-2004-094 R1 affecting Airbus A330 model aircraft. France is the State of Design for this type. CASA has assessed this AD and has issued Australian AD/A330/17, Amendment 3, which will become effective on
4 June 2009. This AD cancels and replaces the previous issue.
As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframes& Structures in the Airworthiness Engineering Group, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
Overview
The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted to ensure the safety of air navigation and to provide a legal framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia, empowers the Governor-General to make regulations under section 98. These regulations are intended to maintain and enhance the safety of air navigation, thereby protecting both the aviation industry and the public. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further specify that the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for particular types of aircraft or aeronautical products, thereby ensuring compliance with international safety standards. This legislative framework is designed to address potential safety issues by mandating corrective actions and maintaining the airworthiness of aircraft registered in Australia. CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, plays a crucial role in enforcing these regulations and ensuring that all aircraft meet the necessary safety standards.
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 explicitly state that ADs are legislative instruments, subject to disallowance under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and oversight under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. In the context of international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design holds the primary responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to relevant States of Registry. CASA is tasked with assessing such information and issuing corresponding Australian ADs to enforce the required safety measures. This process ensures that Australia meets its international commitments while maintaining high safety standards for aircraft operating within its jurisdiction. The issuance of Australian AD/A330/17, Amendment 3, in response to the French DGAC’s AD F-2004-094 R1, exemplifies this collaborative approach to aviation safety.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation (Airworthiness) Regulations 1998, which were made under the authority of section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) concerning specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives are legislative instruments, subject to disallowance as per section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and are treated as such under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The ADs are instrumental in ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft as mandated by Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The State of Design bears the primary responsibility for the airworthiness of an aircraft type, while the State of Registry, in this case CASA, must ensure the aircraft's continuing airworthiness. When the French DGAC issued AD F-2004-094 R1 concerning Airbus A330 model aircraft, CASA, in its capacity as Australia's national airworthiness authority, assessed the directive and subsequently issued Australian AD/A330/17, Amendment 3. This action aligns with Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation and was executed without public consultation, as determined by the Office of Best Practice Regulation, which found that such ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to create regulations aimed at ensuring the safety of air navigation (section 98). Under this authority, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (the Regulations) permit the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products (regulation 39.001). An AD is legally considered a disallowable instrument under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, and thus is a legislative instrument according to section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (subregulation 39.001(5)). These directives are essential tools for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types, as outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
In terms of obligations, the State of Design holds overall responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of a specific aircraft type and must provide any necessary information to ensure this to the appropriate States of Registry (Annex 8). The State of Registry, in this case CASA, must then assess this information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to enforce the requirements set by the State of Design. This ensures that Australian aircraft comply with international safety standards. For example, following the issuance of AD F-2004-094 R1 by the French DGAC affecting Airbus A330 models, CASA issued Australian AD/A330/17, Amendment 3, which took effect on 4 June 2009.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in the text for breaching the requirements of these airworthiness directives. However, non-compliance with ADs could potentially lead to severe consequences such as aircraft being grounded or denied airworthiness certification, which in turn could result in operational disruptions and legal liabilities for the aircraft operators. Ensuring adherence to these directives is crucial for maintaining safety standards in aviation.