COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
Agusta 109 Series Helicopters
AD/A109/37 Tail Rotor Blades P/N 109-8132-01-111 4/2003
Applicability: All Agusta A109E helicopters equipped with tail rotor blades part number 109-8132- 01-107 or -109, and all tail rotor blades part number 109-8132-01-107 or -109 in storage which have accumulated flight hours on the Model 109E helicopter.
Requirement: Remove from service, all tail rotor blades part number 109-8132-01-107 and -109, and replace with part number 109-8132-01-111 tail rotor blades.
Note: Tail rotor blade part number 109-8132-01-111 has a retirement life of 1,000 flight hours.
Note: ENAC AD 2001-496 refers.
Compliance: Before further flight after 17 April 2003, unless already accomplished.
This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 17 April 2003.
Background: Reports were received from operators of the occurrence of cracks on tail rotor blades part number 109-8132-01-107 and -109. In response, the manufacturer has developed improved tail rotor blades by modifying the manufacturing process and increasing the thickness of the blade skins; with resultant increased structural strength.
David Alan Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 4 March 2003
The above AD is notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 26 March 2003.
Page 1 of 1
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended through the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 Amendment (Airworthiness Directives) 2003, introduced an Airworthiness Directive (AD) to address safety concerns related to tail rotor blades on Agusta A109E helicopters. This AD was issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, in response to reports of cracks on certain tail rotor blades. The directive mandates the replacement of tail rotor blades part numbers 109-8132-01-107 and -109 with the improved part number 109-8132-01-111, which has a longer service life. The policy objective of this AD is to enhance the safety of Agusta A109E helicopters by mitigating the risk of blade failure, thereby protecting flight safety and preventing potential accidents. The AD became effective on 17 April 2003, requiring compliance before further flight after that date unless the action had already been completed.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, specifically Part 39 - 105, encompasses the legislative framework governing the issue and compliance of Airworthiness Directives (AD) by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This particular AD, AD/A109/37, pertains to the Agusta 109 Series Helicopters, more specifically the Agusta A109E helicopters, mandating that tail rotor blades with part numbers 109-8132-01-107 or -109 be removed from service and replaced with part number 109-8132-01-111 blades. The directive applies to all Agusta A109E helicopters equipped with the specified tail rotor blades and any blades of the same part numbers in storage that have been used on the Model 109E helicopter. The AD requires the replacement action to be completed before further flight after 17 April 2003, unless already accomplished, and it became effective on that date. This regulation is issued under subregulation 39.1(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, extending the regulatory reach of CASA to ensure compliance and enhance aviation safety across the Commonwealth of Australia.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, particularly under PART 39 - 105, mandates specific actions concerning airworthiness through the issuance of Airworthiness Directives (ADs) (subreg. 39.1(1)). In this instance, AD/A109/37 focuses on Agusta 109 Series Helicopters, specifically those equipped with certain tail rotor blades. This directive mandates the removal of specific tail rotor blades part numbers 109-8132-01-107 and -109 and their replacement with part number 109-8132-01-111. This action is necessitated by reports of cracks in the original blades, which have been addressed by the manufacturer through modifications in the manufacturing process and increased blade skin thickness to enhance structural integrity.
The AD applies to all Agusta A109E helicopters equipped with the specified tail rotor blades, as well as any such blades in storage that have accumulated flight hours on the Model 109E helicopter (applicability section). Operators must remove the affected tail rotor blades and replace them with the specified new blades before further flight after 17 April 2003, unless the action has already been taken (compliance section). This directive came into effect on 17 April 2003, as published in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 26 March 2003.
The AD imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Primarily, operators of Agusta A109E helicopters must ensure that the specified tail rotor blades are either removed and replaced or are not used in any flight. This requirement extends to any stored blades that have accumulated flight hours on the Model 109E helicopter. The directive mandates that the replacement blades (part number 109-8132-01-111) be installed before any subsequent flight, with the new blades having a retirement life of 1,000 flight hours. Operators must also comply with any additional instructions provided within the directive to ensure the safety and airworthiness of their aircraft.
Failure to comply with this AD can result in significant consequences. While the regulations do not explicitly state the penalties for non-compliance, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 generally provide for both civil and criminal penalties for violations. Civil penalties can include substantial fines, while criminal penalties may involve imprisonment. Additionally, non-compliance can lead to aircraft being grounded, which can have severe operational and financial implications for operators. The directive references ENAC AD 2001-496, indicating that similar requirements and consequences may apply under European regulations, thereby reinforcing the importance of compliance.