AD/750XL/8 - Fuselage Roof, Station 180.85

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006L03405 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATIONS 1998

ISSUE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Subregulation 39.001(5) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provides that an AD is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, an AD is a legislative instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess that information and, if appropriate, issue an Australian AD to mandate the requirements of the State of Design.

The New Zealand CAA has issued AD DCA/750XL/8 affecting Pacific Aerospace 750XL model aircraft.  New Zealand is the State of Design for this type.  CASA has assessed this AD and has issued Australian AD/750XL/8, which will become effective on 26 October 2006. 

As this AD is issued because of Australia’s obligations under Convention on International Civil Aviation, and because it is issued in response to an AD raised by the relevant State of Design, no consultation of the Australian public has taken place on this AD.  The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

The AD has been made by the Manager, Airframes in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted to ensure the safety of civil aviation in Australia, and to facilitate and regulate the provision of air navigation services. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provide further detail on the regulatory framework for ensuring the safety of air navigation, including the process for issuing airworthiness directives. The Act and Regulations were introduced to address the need for a comprehensive legal framework to govern civil aviation in Australia, ensuring the safety of air navigation and the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 was enacted by the Australian Parliament, with the objective of ensuring the safety of civil aviation in Australia. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may issue airworthiness directives for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. The issuing of airworthiness directives is a legislative instrument, and is subject to disallowance under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Airworthiness directives are issued in accordance with Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which provides that the State of Design has overall responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness, and must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must assess any airworthiness directives issued by the State of Design, and issue Australian airworthiness directives as appropriate.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as governed by the Civil Aviation Act 1988, provide the framework within which airworthiness directives (ADs) are issued to ensure the safety of air navigation. This legislation applies to all aircraft registered in Australia and the personnel or entities involved in their maintenance, operation, and oversight, such as aircraft manufacturers, operators, and airworthiness authorities like CASA (Civil Aviation Safety Authority). The Act's reach extends nationally, in alignment with Australia's obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which mandates that States of Design have the responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types and must provide necessary information to the States of Registry. When a State of Design issues an AD, the State of Registry, in this case CASA, must evaluate and, if necessary, issue a corresponding Australian AD. This ensures that Australian-registered aircraft meet international safety standards. Notably, ADs are considered legislative instruments, subject to disallowance and review processes, but typically do not require public consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement, as they are directly related to international safety protocols.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 provides the legislative framework for civil aviation in Australia, and under section 98, the Governor-General is empowered to make regulations in the interests of air navigation safety. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are considered disallowable instruments under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, meaning they must be tabled in Parliament and can be disallowed by either House. Additionally, under section 6 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, ADs are regarded as legislative instruments. The obligations imposed by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 are significant for ensuring the safety and airworthiness of aircraft. The State of Design, which is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of a particular aircraft type, must provide necessary information to States of Registry. This is in accordance with Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. States of Registry, including Australia through CASA, must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft registered within their jurisdiction. When the State of Design issues an AD, CASA must assess the information and, if appropriate, issue a corresponding Australian AD to enforce the State of Design's requirements. This process was followed in the case of the New Zealand CAA's AD DCA/750XL/8, which CASA has adopted as Australian AD/750XL/8, effective from 26 October 2006. Given that the AD in question is a response to international obligations and the AD issued by the relevant State of Design, the Australian public has not been consulted. The Office of Regulatory Review has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement. The AD was made by the Manager, Airframes in the Manufacturing, Certification and New Technologies Office on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A(2) of the Act. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 also establish consequences for non-compliance with ADs. Failure to comply with an AD can result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, operators who do not comply with an AD can face fines of up to $22,200 for individuals and $111,000 for corporations. Additionally, CASA can impose administrative penalties, such as grounding the aircraft in question or suspending or revoking an air operator certificate. In serious cases, criminal charges may be pursued, resulting in more severe penalties, including imprisonment. These provisions underscore the importance of compliance with ADs to maintain the highest safety standards in civil aviation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.