Academic Board (Election of Members) Order (No. 2) 2014

Overview

The Australian National University Academic Board (Election of Members) Order (No. 2) 2014 was enacted to address the need for clarity and specificity in the composition and election of members of the Academic Board and its committees, particularly in relation to the holders of certain offices within the university. This Order was introduced under the authority of the Academic Board and Committees Statute 2014, specifically paragraph 6.1(i), and was developed to ensure that the governance structures within the university are clearly defined and properly managed. The primary objective of the Order is to clarify the roles and responsibilities of various office holders within the university's executive committees, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and accountability of the Academic Board. The Order was approved by the Vice-Chancellor of the University, following a recommendation from the Academic Board, and was finalised by the Corporate Governance and Risk Office on 18 November 2014.

Scope and Application

The Australian National University Academic Board (Election of Members) Order (No. 2) 2014 pertains to the governance structure of the Australian National University (ANU) and specifically delineates which office holders are considered members of the ANU College Executive Committees for election purposes under the Academic Board and Committees Statute 2014. This Order applies to the internal management and administrative framework of the ANU, governing how members of the Academic Board and committees are elected. It is pertinent to individuals who hold specified offices within the university, ensuring that their roles and responsibilities are clearly defined for the purposes of these elections. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this Order is confined to the Commonwealth of Australia, as it concerns the internal governance of a federal institution. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the Order itself, although the broader statute may contain such provisions. The application of the Order may be further extended or detailed through subordinate instruments under the authority of the Academic Board and Committees Statute 2014.

Key Provisions

The Australian National University Academic Board (Election of Members) Order (No. 2) 2014 provides clear guidelines regarding the composition and election of members for the ANU College Executive Committees. Section 1 of the Order states that it is made under the authority of the Academic Board and Committees Statute 2014, specifically under paragraph 6.1(i). The primary purpose of this Order is to specify which office holders are to be regarded as members of the ANU College Executive Committees, ensuring clarity and consistency in the governance structure of the university (section 2). The Order itself does not incorporate any other documents by reference, which makes it a standalone instrument for determining committee membership (section 4). The Order imposes certain obligations on the parties involved, ensuring that the composition of the ANU College Executive Committees is transparent and well-defined. It requires that specific office holders be included as members of these committees, thereby establishing a clear framework for their roles and responsibilities (section 1). This delineation is crucial for the effective functioning of the Academic Board and the various committees under its purview. The Vice-Chancellor’s approval of the Order, following the recommendation of the Academic Board, underscores the importance of these provisions in maintaining the university’s governance standards (section 4). In terms of potential breaches and consequences, the Order does not explicitly outline offences, penalties, or specific civil or criminal consequences for non-compliance within its text. However, deviations from the specified membership criteria could potentially lead to governance issues or challenges in the university's administrative processes. The Academic Board and Committees Statute 2014, under which this Order is made, might include broader provisions that address such breaches, but these are not detailed in the Order itself. Therefore, any significant non-compliance could be addressed under the broader statutory framework governing the university's operations.