THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
academic board (election of members) order (No. 2) 2012
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
1. Authority for making the instrument. Australian National University Academic Board Statute 2012, paragraph 6.1(g).
2. Purpose and operation of the instrument. The Order specifies the academic areas that are to be regarded as schools and centres for the purposes of paragraph 6.1(g) of the Australian National University Academic Board Statute 2012.
3. Documents incorporated in the instrument by reference. None.
4. Consultation process. The Vice-Chancellor of the University approved the Order on 4 April 2012.
Governance Office
4 April 2012.
Overview
The Australian National University Academic Board (Election of Members) Order (No. 2) 2012 was enacted to delineate the academic areas that are to be classified as schools and centres within the Australian National University (ANU). This Order was developed under the authority of the Australian National University Academic Board Statute 2012, specifically in accordance with paragraph 6.1(g). It was introduced to provide clarity and structure in the election of members to the Academic Board, ensuring that the representation aligns with the defined academic divisions. The purpose of the Order is to operationalise the governance framework set out in the Statute by specifying the academic areas, thereby facilitating a more organised and representative academic board election process. The Order was approved by the Vice-Chancellor of the University on 4 April 2012, reflecting the institution’s commitment to maintaining an effective governance structure.
Scope and Application
The Australian National University Academic Board (Election of Members) Order (No. 2) 2012 outlines the specific academic areas that are to be recognised as schools and centres for the purposes of member elections within the Academic Board of the Australian National University, as mandated by paragraph 6.1(g) of the Australian National University Academic Board Statute 2012. This legislative instrument applies to the academic staff and administrative bodies within the Australian National University, governing their roles in the election process for Academic Board members. The Order delineates the scope of academic areas to be considered in these elections, ensuring a structured and clear delineation of responsibilities and representation within the university's governance framework. The Order is a direct application of the Australian National University Academic Board Statute 2012 and does not extend its reach beyond the university's internal governance structure. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the Order itself, though the broader statute may provide for such provisions. The Order does not incorporate any external documents by reference and was approved by the Vice-Chancellor on 4 April 2012, reflecting the university's internal governance processes.
Key Provisions
The Australian National University Academic Board (Election of Members) Order (No. 2) 2012, made under the Australian National University Academic Board Statute 2012, outlines the academic areas that are to be recognised as schools and centres for the purpose of electing members to the Academic Board. Specifically, section 3(1) identifies these academic areas, ensuring clarity and precision in the governance structure of the university.
In terms of obligations, the Order mandates that the specified academic areas must be considered for the purposes of electing members to the Academic Board as per section 3(1). This requirement ensures that the academic community's representation within the Board reflects the university's organisational structure, enabling effective governance and representation of all academic disciplines.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this Order could potentially lead to governance issues within the Academic Board, although the Order itself does not explicitly state any penalties or consequences for non-compliance. However, any governance or operational issues arising from a misinterpretation or non-application of the Order could have broader implications for the university's academic integrity and decision-making processes.