Tael One Partners Limited (Appellant) v Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc (Respondent)

Case

[2015] UKSC 12


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Tael One Partners Limited (Appellant) v Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc (Respondent) [2015] UKSC 12 [2015] UKSC 12

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Tael One Partners Limited (Appellant) v Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc (Respondent), the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom was tasked with interpreting the contractual terms of a loan participation agreement in the context of the secondary loan market. The central issue was whether the Appellant, Tael One Partners Limited, was entitled to a portion of the payment premium from the Respondent, Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc, for the period prior to the transfer of a participation in a syndicated loan. The loan participation agreement incorporated the Loan Market Association (LMA) standard terms and conditions, which are commonly used in the secondary loan market.

The Court of Appeal had previously held that the LMA terms did not entitle Tael to the portion of the payment premium in question. The Supreme Court was asked to review this decision, focusing on the interpretation of Condition 11.9(a) of the LMA terms, which addresses the allocation of interest and fees accruing by reference to the lapse of time. The Court found that the payment premium did not "accrue by reference to the lapse of time" in the way that interest or fees do. Rather, the payment premium was contingent upon the specific event of the loan's repayment or prepayment. Therefore, the Court held that Condition 11.9(a) did not confer any additional entitlement beyond what was already payable under other conditions of the LMA terms.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal, dismissing Tael's appeal. The Court found that the LMA terms did not entitle Tael to the portion of the payment premium claimed, as the payment premium did not accrue by reference to the lapse of time but rather was contingent on the specific event of loan repayment or prepayment. The Supreme Court's decision provides clarity on the interpretation of the LMA terms and their application to the allocation of payment premiums in loan participation agreements.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Contract Law

Legal Concepts

  • Contract Formation

  • Breach of Contract

  • Implied Terms

  • Compensatory Damages

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

8

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0