Inglis Junior v. Inglis or Breen and Another

Case

[1890] UKHL 1033

No judgment structure available for this case.

Page: 1033

House of Lords.

Monday, March 3. 1890.

(Before Lords Herschell, Watson, Macnaghten, and Morris.)

27 SLR 1033

Inglis Junior

v.

Inglis or Breen and Another.

( Ante, May 31, 1887, vol. xxiv. p. 52; 14 R. 740.)


Subject_Succession — Will — Election between Testamentary Provisions and Legitim — Essential Error. Headnote:

John Inglis junior appealed.

The case was opened, but their Lordships having expressed opinions unfavourable thereto, the appeal was withdrawn.

Counsel:

Counsel for the Appellant— Lord Advocate—Rigby, Q.C. Agents— Grahames, Currey, and Spens, for Webster, Will, & Ritchie, S.S.C.

Counsel for the Respondents— Asher, Q.C.—C. J. Guthrie. Agent— Andrew Beveridge, for H. B. & F. J. Dewar, W.S.

1890
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0