Harcus Sinclair LLP (Respondent) v Your Lawyers Ltd (Appellant)
Case
•
[2021] UKSC 32
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Harcus Sinclair LLP (Respondent) v Your Lawyers Ltd (Appellant) [2021] UKSC 32
[2021] UKSC 32
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal in Harcus Sinclair LLP (Respondent) v Your Lawyers Ltd (Appellant) concerned a dispute between two law firms over a non-compete undertaking in relation to group litigation concerning diesel emissions from vehicles manufactured by Volkswagen. The central issue was whether the non-compete undertaking was an unreasonable restraint of trade. The Supreme Court held that the non-compete undertaking was not an unreasonable restraint of trade, as the law firm did have legitimate interests to protect through the non-compete undertaking, which flowed from the intended informal collaboration. The Court of Appeal had made an error of law in overruling the judge's reasoning that one could take into account the parties' non-contractual intentions to collaborate informally. The Supreme Court also concluded that the non-compete undertaking was not a solicitor's undertaking and, if it was a solicitor's undertaking, it would not have been enforceable under the court's summary jurisdiction over its officers against the law firm because it was not an officer of the court. The appeal was allowed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Contract Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Implied Terms
-
Restraint of Trade
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Carson v Lee [2023] NZHC 323
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Employsure Ltd v McMurchy
[2021] NSWSC 1179
Carson v Lee
[2023] NZHC 323
Employsure Ltd v McMurchy
[2021] NSWSC 1179
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
Egon Zehnder Ltd v Tillman
[2019] UKSC 32
Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd
[2020] UKSC 36
Patel v Mirza
[2016] UKSC 42