R v Wang

Jiqing Wang was found guilty of possessing 35.32 kilograms of pseudoephedrine, a precursor for methamphetamine, for the purpose of supply. The consignment, concealed within a pizza oven, was intended for delivery to Wang's address. The key legal issue was whether Wang had actual knowledge of the package's contents or was wilfully blind. The court found that Wang either knew or should have known about the drugs.

The court considered multiple factors including Wang's communications with Lucky Wang, his instructions to his girlfriend, and his actions after the delivery. The court concluded that Wang had actual knowledge of the drugs. The court then assessed Wang's culpability, noting his significant role in the importation despite being at the lower end of the supply chain. The court also considered the large quantity of drugs and the potential harm to the community.

The court examined various sentencing precedents and concluded that a starting point of five years and six months was appropriate. After considering mitigating factors such as Wang's good character and lack of a criminal history, the court imposed a sentence of four years and six months imprisonment. The court did not consider a minimum term of imprisonment necessary.