R v Snowden
Case
•
[2017] NZHC 1291
•7 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Snowden [2017] NZHC 1291
[2017] NZHC 1291
7 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The defendant, Tawaiti Snowden, was convicted on 22 charges related to the supply, offering to supply, possession for supply, and conspiracy to supply methamphetamine. The case was heard by Hinton J in the High Court of New Zealand, Whangarei Registry. Snowden pleaded guilty to all charges, which arose from the police investigation "Operation Atlas" targeting the Head Hunters motorcycle gang. Snowden, an associate of the gang, operated as a street-level dealer and was involved with individuals from the gang in the manufacture and supply of methamphetamine in the Northland area.
The court was required to decide on the appropriate sentence for Snowden, considering the purposes and principles of sentencing, including accountability, denunciation, deterrence, responsibility, community protection, and rehabilitation. The court also had to determine the starting point for sentencing, taking into account the amount of methamphetamine involved, the commercial nature of the offending, and the seriousness of the drug. Additionally, the court needed to consider aggravating and mitigating factors, such as Snowden's lack of previous convictions, his remorse, and his evidentiary concessions.
Hinton J sentenced Snowden to three years and three months' imprisonment for the charges of offering to supply, supplying, conspiracy to supply, and possession for supply of methamphetamine. Each sentence was to be served concurrently, with a maximum period of three years and three months' imprisonment. Snowden was discharged on the remaining three charges, as the Crown offered no evidence. The court took into account the starting point of four years and six months' imprisonment, reduced by a 25 per cent discount for Snowden's guilty plea and a two-month discount for remorse. The court also considered the commercial nature of the offending and the gravity of the drug involved.
The court was required to decide on the appropriate sentence for Snowden, considering the purposes and principles of sentencing, including accountability, denunciation, deterrence, responsibility, community protection, and rehabilitation. The court also had to determine the starting point for sentencing, taking into account the amount of methamphetamine involved, the commercial nature of the offending, and the seriousness of the drug. Additionally, the court needed to consider aggravating and mitigating factors, such as Snowden's lack of previous convictions, his remorse, and his evidentiary concessions.
Hinton J sentenced Snowden to three years and three months' imprisonment for the charges of offering to supply, supplying, conspiracy to supply, and possession for supply of methamphetamine. Each sentence was to be served concurrently, with a maximum period of three years and three months' imprisonment. Snowden was discharged on the remaining three charges, as the Crown offered no evidence. The court took into account the starting point of four years and six months' imprisonment, reduced by a 25 per cent discount for Snowden's guilty plea and a two-month discount for remorse. The court also considered the commercial nature of the offending and the gravity of the drug involved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Supply of Controlled Substances
-
Conspiracy
-
Guilty Plea
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Snowden [2017] NZHC 1291
Most Recent Citation
R v McGoldrick-Savaii [2018] NZHC 233
Cases Citing This Decision
4
R v McGoldrick-Savaii
[2018] NZHC 233
McGarrett v The Queen
[2017] NZHC 2785
R v McGoldrick-Savaii
[2018] NZHC 233
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
R v Housham
[2016] NZHC 1652
R v Jarden
[2008] NZSC 69
Hessell v R
[2010] NZSC 135