R v Ram

Case

[2015] NZHC 2813

12 November 2015


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Ram [2015] NZHC 2813 [2015] NZHC 2813 12 November 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant, Jiwan Ram, was convicted of the murder of Ms Bimla Wati. The court heard arguments from the Crown, represented by K A Lummis and D J Dufty, and the defendant, represented by H B Leabourn. The key issue for the court was to determine the minimum period of imprisonment that Ram must serve before being eligible for parole. The court also had to consider the purposes and principles of sentencing, including denunciation, accountability, deterrence, and protection of the public.

The court found that the murder was aggravated by the intensity and location of the stabbings, Bimla's vulnerability, and the breach of trust. The court did not consider the harm caused to the family as an aggravating factor for the purposes of the sentencing assessment. The court acknowledged some mitigating factors, including the absence of premeditation, some degree of provocation, and the short duration of the acts of murder and harm. However, the court did not accept that Ram had expressed genuine remorse for his actions.

The court found that the level of brutality and callousness in this case did not attract a minimum sentence of 17 years, as provided for in Section 104 of the Sentencing Act 2002. Instead, the court considered the features of the offending to be comparable to other domestic cases involving multiple stabbings, which attracted minimum sentences in the range of 10 to 12.5 years. The court imposed a minimum period of 11 years and 5 months of imprisonment before Ram would be eligible for parole.

The court also issued a three-strike warning to Ram, advising that any future serious violence offence, except murder, would result in a final warning. If Ram committed another serious violence offence and received a sentence of imprisonment other than life imprisonment for manslaughter or preventive detention, he would serve the sentence without parole. If Ram was convicted of murder, he would be sentenced to life imprisonment, which he would have to serve without parole unless it would be manifestly unjust.

In summary, the court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment on Jiwan Ram for the murder of Bimla Wati, with a minimum period of 11 years and 5 months before he would be eligible for parole. The court also issued a three-strike warning to Ram, advising him of the consequences of any future serious violence offences.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Murder

  • Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

  • Sentencing

  • Non-Parole Period

  • Life Imprisonment

  • Provocation

  • Domestic Violence

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
R v Fualau [2022] NZHC 3252

Cases Citing This Decision

4

R v Fualau [2022] NZHC 3252
R v Prasad [2018] NZHC 3225
R v Fualau [2022] NZHC 3252
Cases Cited

2

Statutory Material Cited

0

R v Singh [2015] NZHC 2369
Hamidzadeh v R [2012] NZCA 550
R v Singh [2015] NZHC 2369