R v Nicholas
Case
•
[2017] NZHC 3043
•08 December 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Nicholas [2017] NZHC 3043
[2017] NZHC 3043
08 December 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the High Court of New Zealand, Auckland Registry, the defendant, Sean Clifford Nicholas, pleaded guilty to charges of threatening to do harm to people or property, and breaching release conditions. The court was required to decide on an appropriate sentence, taking into account the aggravating and mitigating factors. The court established a starting point for the offending, adjusting it up or down based on personal factors. The court considered the defendant's criminal history, health conditions, and pleas of guilty. Ultimately, the court decided to uplift the starting point by three months to reflect the defendant's previous convictions, resulting in an overall starting point of 19 months' imprisonment. However, the court granted a discount of five months for the defendant's pleas of guilty, resulting in an overall sentence of 14 months' imprisonment, to be served concurrently.
The court also considered the defendant's health conditions, which include fibromyalgia and various mental health problems. The court acknowledged that the defendant's health problems may contribute to his offending behaviour, but ultimately decided not to give a discount for these conditions as they also make him a danger to the public. The court denied the defendant's request for leave to apply for home detention in the future, given his criminal history and ongoing danger to the public. The court did not make a reparation order as the defendant has no means to meet it. The final orders of the court were for the defendant to serve 14 months' imprisonment for the charge of threatening to do harm to people or property, and four months' imprisonment for the charge of breaching release conditions, with both sentences to be served concurrently.
The court also considered the defendant's health conditions, which include fibromyalgia and various mental health problems. The court acknowledged that the defendant's health problems may contribute to his offending behaviour, but ultimately decided not to give a discount for these conditions as they also make him a danger to the public. The court denied the defendant's request for leave to apply for home detention in the future, given his criminal history and ongoing danger to the public. The court did not make a reparation order as the defendant has no means to meet it. The final orders of the court were for the defendant to serve 14 months' imprisonment for the charge of threatening to do harm to people or property, and four months' imprisonment for the charge of breaching release conditions, with both sentences to be served concurrently.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Threatening harm to people or property
-
Breach of release conditions
-
Premeditation
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Guilty Plea
-
Concurrent Sentences
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Nicholas [2017] NZHC 3043
Most Recent Citation
Maid v R [2021] NZCA 456
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Beckett v The State of New South Wales
[2012] NSWCA 114
Beckett v The State of New South Wales (No. 1)
[2011] NSWSC 818
Maid v R
[2021] NZCA 456
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Taylor v R
[2017] NZHC 1356
King v Department of Corrections
[2013] NZHC 3378
Jenkins v Department of Corrections
[2014] NZHC 2895