R v Fahey
Case
•
[2015] NZHC 78
•5 February 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Fahey [2015] NZHC 78
[2015] NZHC 78
5 February 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the High Court of New Zealand, Greville Henare Fahey was sentenced for the murder of Steven Harris. The defendant was found guilty of stabbing Mr Harris in Myers Park, Auckland, on 4 September 2013. The court had to determine the appropriate minimum term of imprisonment to be imposed under the Sentencing Act 2002, considering the need for denunciation, accountability, deterrence, and protection of the community. The defendant had a history of violent offenses, including 15 separate convictions for acts of violence and 202 previous convictions overall. The court considered these factors in deciding on the minimum term.
The court acknowledged the impact of the crime on the victim's family, particularly the victim's sister, who had to relive the events during the trial. The Crown argued for a minimum term of more than ten years due to the defendant's history of violence. The defendant's propensity for violence, particularly with knives, and his history of violent behavior in various contexts, including family, prison, and strangers, led the court to consider him a danger to the community. The court reviewed relevant authorities and decided to increase the minimum term by two years to reflect the defendant's risk, resulting in a total minimum term of 12 years.
The sentencing remarks concluded that the defendant was to be sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 12 years before being eligible to apply for parole. The defendant's history of violent behavior, propensity for using weapons, and the significant impact on the victim's family justified the increased minimum term. The court aimed to balance the need for punishment, deterrence, and community protection with the principles of consistency and proportionality in sentencing.
The court acknowledged the impact of the crime on the victim's family, particularly the victim's sister, who had to relive the events during the trial. The Crown argued for a minimum term of more than ten years due to the defendant's history of violence. The defendant's propensity for violence, particularly with knives, and his history of violent behavior in various contexts, including family, prison, and strangers, led the court to consider him a danger to the community. The court reviewed relevant authorities and decided to increase the minimum term by two years to reflect the defendant's risk, resulting in a total minimum term of 12 years.
The sentencing remarks concluded that the defendant was to be sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 12 years before being eligible to apply for parole. The defendant's history of violent behavior, propensity for using weapons, and the significant impact on the victim's family justified the increased minimum term. The court aimed to balance the need for punishment, deterrence, and community protection with the principles of consistency and proportionality in sentencing.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
Aggravated & Exemplary Damages
-
Vicarious Liability
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Fahey [2015] NZHC 78
Most Recent Citation
R v Hussein [2022] NZHC 3034
Cases Citing This Decision
10
R v Hussein
[2022] NZHC 3034
R v Herkt
[2016] NZHC 284
R v Kingi
[2016] NZHC 139