R v Clement
Case
•
[2013] NZHC 1422
•14 June 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Clement [2013] NZHC 1422
[2013] NZHC 1422
14 June 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of R v Clement, the defendant, Troy Ashley Clement, was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced by Priestley J in the High Court of New Zealand. Clement was found guilty of robbing two young female German tourists at knife point in Albert Park, Auckland. The court considered the use of a weapon, the violence used against the victims, and the vulnerability of the victims as significant aggravating factors. The court also noted the premeditation and impact on the victims as additional aggravating factors. The court rejected the submissions of leniency and home detention, considering imprisonment the appropriate punishment for the crime.
The legal issues the court had to decide included the appropriate starting point for the sentence and whether there were any mitigating factors. The court considered the Court of Appeal tariff judgment of R v Mako and a sentence of Venning J in R v Gladstone as relevant precedents. The court decided on a starting point of four years imprisonment but discounted it by two months, resulting in a sentence of three years and ten months imprisonment. The court also recommended that Clement participate in drug assessment and drug counselling programmes, and life skills courses during his imprisonment.
Priestley J sentenced Clement to three years and ten months imprisonment on the count of aggravated robbery. The court recommended that Clement participate in drug assessment and drug counselling programmes, and life skills courses during his imprisonment. The court also noted the vulnerability of the victims and the impact on them, as well as the premeditation and use of a weapon as significant aggravating factors. The court rejected submissions for leniency and home detention, considering imprisonment the appropriate punishment for the crime.
The legal issues the court had to decide included the appropriate starting point for the sentence and whether there were any mitigating factors. The court considered the Court of Appeal tariff judgment of R v Mako and a sentence of Venning J in R v Gladstone as relevant precedents. The court decided on a starting point of four years imprisonment but discounted it by two months, resulting in a sentence of three years and ten months imprisonment. The court also recommended that Clement participate in drug assessment and drug counselling programmes, and life skills courses during his imprisonment.
Priestley J sentenced Clement to three years and ten months imprisonment on the count of aggravated robbery. The court recommended that Clement participate in drug assessment and drug counselling programmes, and life skills courses during his imprisonment. The court also noted the vulnerability of the victims and the impact on them, as well as the premeditation and use of a weapon as significant aggravating factors. The court rejected submissions for leniency and home detention, considering imprisonment the appropriate punishment for the crime.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Aggravated Robbery
-
Premeditation
-
Victim Impact
-
Weapons
-
Sentencing
-
Aggravating Factors
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Clement [2013] NZHC 1422
Most Recent Citation
Belle v Police [2017] NZHC 877
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0