R v Blance
Case
•
[2018] NZHC 1518
•22 June 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Blance [2018] NZHC 1518
[2018] NZHC 1518
22 June 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the High Court of New Zealand, the case of R v Blance involved the defendant, Steven Albert Blance, who was convicted of multiple drug-related charges and other offenses. Blance pleaded guilty to charges including supplying and possessing methamphetamine for supply, conspiracy to supply methamphetamine, and unlawfully possessing a firearm, ammunition, and a taser. The offenses stemmed from a police operation targeting methamphetamine supply in the Wellington region. Blance was the mastermind behind a sophisticated drug operation involving large-scale supply and distribution of methamphetamine, with an estimated profit exceeding $1.5 million. The court had to determine an appropriate starting point for sentencing, considering the severity and scale of the offenses, Blance's role, and relevant legal precedents.
The court identified several aggravating factors, including the significant premeditation and planning involved, the large quantities of methamphetamine supplied, the commercial gain, and Blance's previous convictions. The court compared Blance's case to similar cases involving large-scale methamphetamine supply and importation, determining a starting point of 18 years' imprisonment. An additional year was added to account for the firearms and dishonesty charges, resulting in a total starting point of 19 years' imprisonment. After considering mitigating factors such as Blance's health issues, cognitive impairment, and early steps towards rehabilitation, the court applied a six-month discount. Blance's guilty plea, entered after a significant delay, resulted in a further discount of four years. The court also imposed a minimum period of imprisonment of seven years and three months.
In summary, Blance was sentenced to 14 years and six months' imprisonment for the methamphetamine charges, 10 years for the conspiracy charges, and one year for the firearms and receiving stolen property charges, with all sentences to be served concurrently. Additionally, a minimum period of imprisonment of seven years and three months was imposed on the primary methamphetamine charge. The court ordered the destruction of all drug-related items and firearms seized during the investigation.
The court identified several aggravating factors, including the significant premeditation and planning involved, the large quantities of methamphetamine supplied, the commercial gain, and Blance's previous convictions. The court compared Blance's case to similar cases involving large-scale methamphetamine supply and importation, determining a starting point of 18 years' imprisonment. An additional year was added to account for the firearms and dishonesty charges, resulting in a total starting point of 19 years' imprisonment. After considering mitigating factors such as Blance's health issues, cognitive impairment, and early steps towards rehabilitation, the court applied a six-month discount. Blance's guilty plea, entered after a significant delay, resulted in a further discount of four years. The court also imposed a minimum period of imprisonment of seven years and three months.
In summary, Blance was sentenced to 14 years and six months' imprisonment for the methamphetamine charges, 10 years for the conspiracy charges, and one year for the firearms and receiving stolen property charges, with all sentences to be served concurrently. Additionally, a minimum period of imprisonment of seven years and three months was imposed on the primary methamphetamine charge. The court ordered the destruction of all drug-related items and firearms seized during the investigation.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Drug Offences
-
Sentencing
-
Jurisdiction
-
Criminal Liability
-
Mens Rea & Intention
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Blance [2018] NZHC 1518
Most Recent Citation
Berkland v R [2022] NZSC 143
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Berkland v R
[2022] NZSC 143
Smith v R
[2020] NZCA 221
Berkland v R
[2020] NZCA 150
Cases Cited
12
Statutory Material Cited
0
R v McGoldrick-Savaii
[2018] NZHC 233
Murray v R
[2014] NZCA 189
R v Rodgers
[2012] NZHC 2296