R v Blackwell
Case
•
[2012] NZHC 2960
•8 November 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Blackwell [2012] NZHC 2960
[2012] NZHC 2960
8 November 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of R v Blackwell, the defendant, Wade James Blackwell, was sentenced in the High Court of New Zealand at Palmerston North. Blackwell pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of methamphetamine for supply, following a sentence indication of two years and six months’ imprisonment by the court. The offending was part of a larger Police investigation into a methamphetamine network, where Blackwell acted as a street dealer. The case involved the purchase and intent to on-sell 11 grams of methamphetamine for profit, emphasising the commercial nature of the arrangement.
The court had to determine an appropriate sentence for Blackwell, considering various factors such as the nature of his involvement in the drug supply network, his guilty plea, and the impact of his imprisonment on his young children. The Crown argued for a starting point of three and a half years’ imprisonment, with a 15 to 20 per cent discount for the guilty plea, while Blackwell’s counsel suggested a starting point of three years, with a 20 to 25 per cent discount for the guilty plea and further reduction for the restricted terms of bail. The purity of the methamphetamine, which was below the 60 per cent level set in R v Fatu, was also considered.
The court ultimately decided on a starting point of three and a half years’ imprisonment, reflecting Blackwell’s position relative to other co-offenders and relevant guideline judgments. The court granted a 20 per cent deduction for the guilty plea and a modest allowance for the bail restrictions and purity, resulting in a final sentence of two and a half years’ imprisonment. The judge expressed hope that this would be Blackwell’s last encounter with the court and encouraged the Parole Board to consider an early release to provide Blackwell with the opportunity to lead a crime-free life.
The court had to determine an appropriate sentence for Blackwell, considering various factors such as the nature of his involvement in the drug supply network, his guilty plea, and the impact of his imprisonment on his young children. The Crown argued for a starting point of three and a half years’ imprisonment, with a 15 to 20 per cent discount for the guilty plea, while Blackwell’s counsel suggested a starting point of three years, with a 20 to 25 per cent discount for the guilty plea and further reduction for the restricted terms of bail. The purity of the methamphetamine, which was below the 60 per cent level set in R v Fatu, was also considered.
The court ultimately decided on a starting point of three and a half years’ imprisonment, reflecting Blackwell’s position relative to other co-offenders and relevant guideline judgments. The court granted a 20 per cent deduction for the guilty plea and a modest allowance for the bail restrictions and purity, resulting in a final sentence of two and a half years’ imprisonment. The judge expressed hope that this would be Blackwell’s last encounter with the court and encouraged the Parole Board to consider an early release to provide Blackwell with the opportunity to lead a crime-free life.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Sentencing
-
Criminal Liability
-
Guilty Plea
-
Possession of Drugs for Supply
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Blackwell [2012] NZHC 2960
Most Recent Citation
R v Haeata [2017] NZHC 959
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Pulete v R
[2013] NZCA 216
R v Haeata
[2017] NZHC 959
R v Chea
[2015] NZHC 1806
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0