McKechnie v R
Case
•
[2018] NZHC 1811
•20 July 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
McKechnie v R [2018] NZHC 1811
[2018] NZHC 1811
20 July 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Craig McKechnie appealed against his sentence of two years and one month imprisonment, imposed by Judge Hollister-Jones in the Rotorua District Court. McKechnie pleaded guilty to seven charges including possession of methamphetamine for supply, possession of utensils, theft of a log splitter, driving while suspended, and breaching sentences of community work and supervision. The High Court was asked to determine whether the sentence was manifestly excessive. The appeal hinged on whether the District Court Judge properly applied the sentencing principles and discounts for McKechnie's remorse, forfeited cash, and guilty pleas. The High Court found that the starting point of three years imprisonment for the methamphetamine charges was within range. While some of the uplifts and discounts applied may have been too high or low, the overall sentence was not manifestly excessive. The appeal against sentence was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Sentencing
-
Appeal
-
Mens Rea & Intention
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
McKechnie v R [2018] NZHC 1811
Most Recent Citation
Galloway v The King [2024] NZHC 40
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Whaanga v The King
[2024] NZCA 29
R v Jordan
[2024] NZHC 1810
Karetu v The King
[2024] NZHC 207
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Keen v R
[2015] NZCA 221
Henderson v R
[2017] NZCA 605
Keen v R
[2015] NZCA 221