Guo v PricewaterhouseCoopers
Case
•
[2022] NZHC 1117
•19 May 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Guo v PricewaterhouseCoopers [2022] NZHC 1117
[2022] NZHC 1117
19 May 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the High Court of New Zealand, Auckland Registry, Yan Guo sought to appeal a decision from the Human Rights Review Tribunal, which dismissed her application for further discovery against PricewaterhouseCoopers. The appeal was dismissed by the court, and the matter now pertains to the costs associated with the appeal. The legal issues before the court were whether the appeal was justified and whether costs should be awarded to PricewaterhouseCoopers.
The court found that PricewaterhouseCoopers had promptly informed Guo of the lack of jurisdiction for her appeal and invited her to withdraw it. Despite this, Guo persisted with the appeal, leading to an application to strike out the appeal. When Guo eventually withdrew the appeal, PricewaterhouseCoopers had already incurred costs, and therefore, the court ruled that costs should follow the event. The court determined that the appropriate amount of costs was slightly less than what PricewaterhouseCoopers sought, calculated on a 2A basis rather than a 2B basis.
The court ordered that Guo is to pay PricewaterhouseCoopers costs in the sum of $2,390.00, together with disbursements in the sum of $173.91, making a total of $2,563.91.
The court found that PricewaterhouseCoopers had promptly informed Guo of the lack of jurisdiction for her appeal and invited her to withdraw it. Despite this, Guo persisted with the appeal, leading to an application to strike out the appeal. When Guo eventually withdrew the appeal, PricewaterhouseCoopers had already incurred costs, and therefore, the court ruled that costs should follow the event. The court determined that the appropriate amount of costs was slightly less than what PricewaterhouseCoopers sought, calculated on a 2A basis rather than a 2B basis.
The court ordered that Guo is to pay PricewaterhouseCoopers costs in the sum of $2,390.00, together with disbursements in the sum of $173.91, making a total of $2,563.91.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Human Rights Law
-
Costs
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Costs
-
Limitation Periods
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice & Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Guo v Human Rights Review Tribunal [2023] NZHC 3883
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Guo v Human Rights Review Tribunal
[2023] NZHC 3883
Guo v Human Rights Review Tribunal
[2022] NZHC 2937
Guo v PricewaterhouseCoopers
[2022] NZHC 1384
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0