Commissioner of Police v Hayward
Case
•
[2013] NZHC 1358
•10 June 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Commissioner of Police v Hayward [2013] NZHC 1358
[2013] NZHC 1358
10 June 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commissioner of Police sought asset and profit forfeiture orders against Mr Hayward under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009. Mr Hayward opposed the application. Mrs Hayward and Mr Finlayson sought relief from the orders. The Court was required to determine whether Mr Hayward had unlawfully benefited from his significant criminal activity, and if so, whether the asset and profit forfeiture orders were appropriate. If so, the Court had to consider whether Mrs Hayward and Mr Finlayson were entitled to relief. The Court found Mr Hayward unlawfully benefited from his significant criminal activity by approximately $397,540. The asset and profit forfeiture orders were appropriate. The Court ordered that the Ducati, commemorative coins and cash be forfeited to the Crown. The maximum recoverable amount was $382,259. The Archibald Road property was to be realised to meet the maximum recoverable amount. Mrs Hayward was entitled to relief in the sum of $52,000. The Court declined Mr Hayward’s application for relief. Costs were awarded to the Commissioner on a 2B basis against Mr Hayward. Leave was reserved to apply further in the event of any issues arising out of implementation of the order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Judicial Review
-
Asset Forfeiture
-
Unlawful Benefit
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Hayward v Commissioner of Police [2014] NZCA 624
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Hayward v Commissioner of Police
[2014] NZCA 625
Hayward v Commissioner of Police
[2014] NZCA 624
Hayward v Commissioner of Police
[2013] NZCA 478
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0