Bublitz v R
Case
•
[2019] NZCA 379
•22 August 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bublitz v The Queen [2019] NZCA 379
[2019] NZCA 379
22 August 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal was brought by two of the five defendants charged with multiple criminal counts in relation to the collapse of two finance companies, Viaduct Capital Ltd and Mutual Finance Ltd. The charges arose from the Crown’s case that the defendants breached limitations on related party transactions in the trust deeds and Crown guarantees. The defendants pleaded not guilty, but the trial was aborted after nine months by Woolford J due to “extensive” and “unprecedented” late disclosure by the Crown. The defendants applied for costs. The Judge awarded Mr Morrison $75,000 under s 5 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 and made an award of $50,000 under s 364 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 to be split five ways between the four defendants and the Crown. Mr Bublitz and Mr Morrison appealed the quantum of the awards. The appeal raised five issues. The first three issues arose on Mr Bublitz’s appeal. The latter two on Mr Morrison’s. Mr Bublitz’s appeal was dismissed. Mr Morrison’s appeal was dismissed. There was no order made as to costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Costs
Legal Concepts
-
Limitation Periods
-
Costs
-
Judicial Review
-
Specific Performance
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bublitz v The Queen [2019] NZCA 379
Most Recent Citation
Attorney-General v Morrison [2025] NZCA 240
Cases Citing This Decision
24
Bublitz v R
[2019] NZSC 139
Attorney-General v Morrison
[2025] NZCA 240
Commissioner of Police v Apanui
[2024] NZCA 307
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
0
R v Bublitz
[2017] NZHC 1059
R v Bublitz
[2018] NZHC 373
Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Stichting Lodestar
[2007] NZSC 103