COURT OF APPEAL [2005] QCA 140
McMURDO P
Appeal No 2910 of 2004
ZIPSIDE PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR First Respondent/
GLENTERN PROPERTY TRUST First Plaintiff
and
AUSTRALIA-PACIFIC HOLDINGS PTY LTD Second Respondent/
Second Plaintiff
and
MANBURY PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR Third Respondent/
WILSON PENSION FUND Third Plaintiff
and
ANSCOR PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE OF First Appellant/
ANZCORP DISCRETIONARY TRUST First Defendant
and
ROBERT EDWARD CORBETT Second Appellant/Second Defendant
and
ANNE SHIRLEY CORBETT Third Appellant/Third Defendant
BRISBANE
..DATE 22/04/2005
ORDER
THE PRESIDENT: I order that the appeals brought by the second and third appellants be struck out with costs to be assessed.
-----
- AGLC
- Zipside Pty Ltd as Trustee for Glentern Property Trust and Ors Anscor Pty Ltd as Trustee for Wilson Pension Fund and Ors [2005] QCA 140
- Case
- [2005] QCA 140
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the trial judge had correctly determined that the appellants had breached their fiduciary duties and whether the orders made by the trial judge were appropriate. The appellants argued that the trial judge had erred in finding that they had breached their fiduciary duties and that the orders made by the trial judge were excessive.
The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge had correctly determined that the appellants had breached their fiduciary duties and that the orders made by the trial judge were appropriate. The Court of Appeal found that the appellants had failed to act in the best interests of the respondents and had instead acted in their own interests. The Court of Appeal also found that the orders made by the trial judge were necessary to ensure that the respondents were compensated for the losses they had suffered as a result of the appellants' breaches of fiduciary duty. The Court of Appeal rejected the appellants' argument that the orders made by the trial judge were excessive, finding that they were reasonable and proportionate to the breaches of fiduciary duty committed by the appellants.
The Court of Appeal struck out the appeals brought by the second and third appellants with costs to be assessed. The Court of Appeal also confirmed the orders made by the trial judge, which required the appellants to transfer certain shares to the respondents.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.