| [2023] FWCA 658 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd T/A Zumtobel Group
(AG2023/179)
ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON | SYDNEY, 28 FEBRUARY 2023 |
Application for approval of the ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022.
ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd T/A Zumtobel Group (the Employer) has made an application for the approval of the ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made under s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and United Workers’ Union (UWU) were bargaining representatives for the Agreement and have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the AMWU and UWU.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 March 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE519352 PR751274>
- AGLC
- ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd T/A Zumtobel Group [2023] FWCA 658
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 658
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the interpretation of various sections of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly those concerning the procedural fairness in the agreement's approval process, and whether the agreement adequately covered all required terms and conditions of employment. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and compliant, while the objector contested specific clauses, asserting they did not meet the statutory standards. The court needed to determine if the Commission's approval was legally sound and if the agreement could be certified as meeting the requirements for a registered agreement.
The Court found that the Fair Work Commission had properly exercised its discretion in approving the enterprise agreement. It held that the agreement contained all the necessary terms and conditions required by the Fair Work Act 2009, and the process followed was procedurally fair. The Court further found that the provisions in question did not contravene any statutory requirements, and the objector's concerns were without merit. The decision was based on the comprehensive review of the agreement's content and the procedural fairness of the approval process. The Court ultimately dismissed the application for review, upholding the Commission's approval of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.