Zeren (Migration)

Case

[2021] AATA 1415

13 April 2021


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Zeren (Migration) [2021] AATA 1415 [2021] AATA 1415 13 April 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application for a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa, subclass 187, Direct Entry stream, by the applicants, including Zeren Group Pty Ltd as the nominator. The dispute arose when the nomination lodged by Zeren Group Pty Ltd was refused by a delegate for the Minister of Home Affairs on 5 July 2019. The applicants sought review of this decision before the Tribunal.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the position to which the visa application related was the subject of an approved nomination, as required by clause 187.233 of the applicable regulations. This clause, among other things, mandates that the nomination must have been approved and not subsequently withdrawn, and that the visa application must be made within six months of the nomination's approval. The Tribunal also considered whether the secondary applicants met the criteria for the visa under clause 187.311.

The Tribunal reasoned that the nomination lodged by Zeren Group Pty Ltd was refused on 5 July 2019 and this refusal remained in effect as no application for judicial review was pending. Furthermore, the Tribunal had previously determined it lacked jurisdiction to review the nomination refusal because the nominator, Zeren Group Pty Ltd, had been deregistered. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the position was not the subject of an approved nomination, and therefore, clause 187.233 was not met. As the primary applicant failed to satisfy this criterion, the Tribunal concluded that the secondary applicants also failed to meet the requirements for the visa.

The Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the applicants the Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Jurisdiction

  • Statutory Construction

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

5

Statutory Material Cited

0