Zdravkovic v The Queen

Zdravkovic appealed against sentences imposed by the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory for the offences of attempting to obtain property by deception and being knowingly concerned in the possession of a drug of dependence with intent to sell or supply.

The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the aggregate sentence imposed was manifestly excessive, particularly in light of the principles concerning the accumulation of sentences and the determination of a non-parole period. The appellant also sought to rely on the decision in *Bui v The Queen* [2015] ACTCA 5.

The Court of Appeal considered the totality of the offending conduct and the sentencing objectives. It applied the principles established in *Bui v The Queen*, which affirmed that when imposing cumulative sentences, a sentencing judge must consider the overall impact of the sentences on the offender and ensure that the aggregate sentence is just and proportionate. The court found that the sentencing judge had properly taken into account all relevant factors, including the seriousness of the offences, the appellant's criminal history, and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. The court concluded that the sentence was not manifestly excessive.

The appeal was dismissed.