Zabulon Pty Ltd T/A Maurice Blackburn Lawyers

Case [2023] FWCA 59


[2023] FWCA 59

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.222—Enterprise agreement

Zabulon Pty Ltd T/A Maurice Blackburn Lawyers


(AG2022/5513)

Clerical industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON

MELBOURNE, 9 JANUARY 2023

Application for termination of the Maurice Blackburn Employees’ Agreement 2020.

  1. Zabulon Pty Ltd T/A Maurice Blackburn Lawyers (the Applicant) has applied, pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), to terminate the Maurice Blackburn Employees’ Agreement 2020[1] (the Agreement). The Agreement is expressed to cover the Applicant and employees falling within the scope of the classification structure in the Agreement. The Agreement’s nominal expiry date was 30 September 2021.

  2. Sections 222 and 223 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an agreement to be terminated pursuant to s.222 of the Act:

    “222 Application for FWC approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement 

    Application for approval 

    (1)If a termination of an enterprise agreement has been agreed to, a person covered by the agreement must apply to FWC for approval of the termination. 

    Material to accompany the application 

    (2)    The application must be accompanied by any declarations that are required by the procedural rules to accompany the application. 

    When the application must be made 

    (3)The application must be made: 

    (a)     within 14 days after the termination is agreed to; or 

    (b)     if in all the circumstances FWC considers it fair to extend that period—within such further period as FWC allows. 

    223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement

If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:

(a)     the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and

(b)     the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and

(c)     the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and

(d)     the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.”

  1. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. It was approved by the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) on 6 November 2020[2]. It was approved to operate from 13 November 2020 with a nominal expiry date of 30 September 2021.

  1. I note the statutory declaration of Sarah Louise Adams (Employee Relations Legal Counsel for the Applicant), which accompanied the application, states that a ballot of employees conducted by electronic means between 16-20 December 2022 resulted in a majority of employees who participated in the ballot, voting in support of termination of the Agreement. The application was filed in the Commission on 22 December 2022.

  1. The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (the ASU) is covered by the Agreement and wrote to my chambers on 9 January 2023 and advised that they did not object to the application to terminate the Agreement. 

  1. Based on the material contained in the employer’s declaration filed with the application, I am satisfied that employees were afforded a reasonable opportunity to approve the termination of the Agreement (s.223(a)) and that a valid majority of employees covered by the Agreement approved its termination (s.223(b)). I am also satisfied that there are no other grounds for believing that employees have not agreed to the termination of the Agreement (s. 223(c)) and that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement taking into account the views of the ASU (s. 223(d)). Having been satisfied as to each of the relevant requirements in s.223, I must terminate the Agreement.

  1. The termination will operate from 9 January 2023. An order giving effect to this decision will be issued in conjunction with this decision. 


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] AE509461

[2] [2020] FWCA 5947

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE509461  PR749477>

Details
AGLC
Zabulon Pty Ltd T/A Maurice Blackburn Lawyers [2023] FWCA 59
Case
[2023] FWCA 59
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Zabulon Pty Ltd T/A Maurice Blackburn Lawyers applied to the Fair Work Commission for the termination of the Maurice Blackburn Employees’ Agreement 2020. The application was made under s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Agreement, approved by the Fair Work Commission, was due to expire on 30 September 2021. The Applicant, Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, sought the termination after a ballot of employees conducted between 16-20 December 2022 resulted in a majority voting in support of the termination. The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, which is covered by the Agreement, did not object to the application.

The Fair Work Commission had to decide if the termination of the Agreement met the conditions outlined in s.223 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The conditions required the Commission to be satisfied that employees were given a reasonable opportunity to decide on the termination, that the termination was agreed to in accordance with s.221 of the Act, that there were no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees did not agree to the termination, and that it was appropriate to terminate the Agreement considering the views of the ASU. The Deputy President of the Commission was satisfied that the conditions were met. The employees had a reasonable opportunity to decide on the termination, a valid majority approved the termination, and there were no other grounds for believing that the employees did not agree to the termination. The Deputy President also considered it appropriate to terminate the Agreement taking into account the views of the ASU.

Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the termination of the Maurice Blackburn Employees’ Agreement 2020. The termination will operate from 9 January 2023. An order giving effect to this decision will be issued in conjunction with this decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.