Zabik and Zabik (No.2)
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 684
•9 March 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Zabik and Zabik (No.2) [2017] FCCA 684
[2017] FCCA 684
9 March 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Zabik and Zabik (No.2)*, heard by Judge Young, the dispute concerned an application filed by the husband on 2 December 2016. The specific nature of the dispute is not fully detailed, but the orders indicate it involved the husband's superannuation interest and the wife's entitlement to information and costs.
The court was required to determine whether to dismiss the husband's application. Additionally, the court considered the necessity of imposing interlocutory orders to restrain the husband from dealing with his superannuation interest and to compel him to provide full particulars of that interest, including relevant rollover documents, to the wife's solicitors. The court also had to determine the wife's entitlement to costs associated with the husband's application.
Judge Young dismissed the husband's application. The court reasoned that it was necessary to restrain the husband from dealing with his superannuation interest until further order, indicating a concern about potential dissipation of assets. Furthermore, the court ordered the husband to provide detailed particulars of his superannuation interest and associated rollover documents to the wife's solicitors by a specified date. The husband was also ordered to pay the wife's costs of and incidental to the application in the sum of $2,500.
The court was required to determine whether to dismiss the husband's application. Additionally, the court considered the necessity of imposing interlocutory orders to restrain the husband from dealing with his superannuation interest and to compel him to provide full particulars of that interest, including relevant rollover documents, to the wife's solicitors. The court also had to determine the wife's entitlement to costs associated with the husband's application.
Judge Young dismissed the husband's application. The court reasoned that it was necessary to restrain the husband from dealing with his superannuation interest until further order, indicating a concern about potential dissipation of assets. Furthermore, the court ordered the husband to provide detailed particulars of his superannuation interest and associated rollover documents to the wife's solicitors by a specified date. The husband was also ordered to pay the wife's costs of and incidental to the application in the sum of $2,500.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Costs
-
Discovery
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Zabik and Zabik (No.2) [2017] FCCA 684
Most Recent Citation
Shannon v Gungalayna Sports and Social Club Inc [2019] FCCA 1524