| [2015] FWCA 3800 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
YY Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1334)
YY ENGINEERING PTY LTD ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 5 JUNE 2015 |
Application for approval of the YY Engineering Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the YY Engineering Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015 (Agreement). The application was made by YY Engineering Pty Ltdpursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with The Australian Workers’ Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE414216 PR568060>
- AGLC
- YY Engineering Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 3800
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 3800
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. These criteria included whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it allowed for the proper operation of the business. The Commission had to examine the provisions concerning the employment of labour hire employees, considering whether they provided adequate protections and whether they complied with existing workplace laws.
In its decision, the Commission carefully reviewed the terms of the agreement and the submissions from both parties. It found that while most provisions of the agreement met the required standards, certain clauses relating to labour hire employees did not adequately safeguard their rights and conditions. The Commission considered that these provisions did not provide the necessary protections and therefore did not meet the criteria for approval. Consequently, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the agreement.
The Commission ordered that the agreement not be approved and directed the parties to return to negotiations to address the deficiencies identified. This decision underscored the importance of ensuring that workplace agreements provide fair and reasonable terms and conditions for all employees, particularly those engaged through labour hire arrangements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.