Young v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2)
Case
•
[2018] NSWCA 91
•23 April 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Young v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 91
[2018] NSWCA 91
23 April 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Young v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2)*, the applicant sought various procedural orders from the Court of Appeal of New South Wales. The dispute concerned the applicant's attempts to review an earlier decision of the Court of Appeal, with specific requests relating to court-annexed mediation, the attendance of the respondent's solicitor at mediation, and the appointment of new independent legal representatives for the respondent.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether an order for court-annexed mediation should be made, whether the respondent's solicitor should be directed not to attend any mediation, and whether new independent legal representatives should be appointed for the respondent. The applicant also sought directions regarding the procedural steps required to review the earlier Court of Appeal decision.
Beazley P dismissed the applicant's amended urgent notice of motion. The Court did not provide detailed reasons for this dismissal in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the applicant's requests were not granted. Consequently, the applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs associated with the motion.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether an order for court-annexed mediation should be made, whether the respondent's solicitor should be directed not to attend any mediation, and whether new independent legal representatives should be appointed for the respondent. The applicant also sought directions regarding the procedural steps required to review the earlier Court of Appeal decision.
Beazley P dismissed the applicant's amended urgent notice of motion. The Court did not provide detailed reasons for this dismissal in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the applicant's requests were not granted. Consequently, the applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs associated with the motion.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Appeal
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Roads and Maritime Services v Young (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1176
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Young v Roads and Maritime Services (No 3)
[2018] NSWCA 106
Roads and Maritime Services v Maureen Young
[2018] NSWSC 1867
Roads and Maritime Services v Young (No 2)
[2018] NSWSC 1176
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
1
Kallinicos v Hunt
[2005] NSWSC 1181
Kallinicos v Hunt
[2005] NSWSC 1181
Kallinicos v Hunt
[2005] NSWSC 1181