Young v Low and QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd

Case

[2022] QSC 235

31 October 2022


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Young v Low and QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2022] QSC 235 [2022] QSC 235 31 October 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Young v Low and QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd, the plaintiff, Ms Young, commenced proceedings against Ms Low, the driver of the other vehicle involved in a traffic accident, and QBE Insurance, Ms Low's insurer, seeking damages for injuries sustained. The defendants admitted negligence but disputed the extent of the injuries and damages claimed. The proceeding was active until Ms Young's solicitors withdrew, after which Ms Young represented herself. Despite several attempts to contact Ms Young and set trial dates, she did not participate in the proceedings. Her affairs were subsequently brought before the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal, which appointed the Public Trustee of Queensland as her administrator for the purpose of managing the proceeding. The Public Trustee declined to accept an appointment as Ms Young's litigation guardian. The court was required to determine whether the trial should be adjourned, whether the proceeding should be referred to the Attorney-General, and whether the costs should be reserved.

The court found that Ms Young's lack of active participation in the proceeding and her apparent incapacity to manage her own affairs necessitated the adjournment of the trial. The court also concluded that the Public Trustee's refusal to act as litigation guardian indicated a need for further intervention. Given these circumstances, the court referred the matter to the Attorney-General for consideration of appropriate action. The court also ordered mediation and reserved the costs pending further developments.

The court's decision was based on Ms Young's evident incapacity to manage her litigation, as evidenced by her failure to participate in the proceeding and the tribunal's appointment of the Public Trustee. The adjournment of the trial was necessary to allow for a resolution of these issues. The referral to the Attorney-General was made to ensure that Ms Young's interests were properly protected. The costs were reserved pending further instructions from the Attorney-General or any other party appointed to manage Ms Young's affairs.

The court made the following orders: the trial was adjourned, an order for mediation was issued, the proceeding was referred to the Attorney-General, and the costs were reserved.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation & Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Limitation Periods

  • Stay of Proceedings

  • Mediation

  • Referral to Attorney-General

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

2

Statutory Material Cited

3

Energex Ltd v Sablatura [2009] QSC 356
Energex Ltd v Sablatura [2009] QSC 356