YCW Pty Ltd atf YCW Family Trust v Northern Beaches Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1359


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: YCW Pty Ltd atf YCW Family Trust v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1359
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 June 2017
Date of orders: 05 July 2017
Decision date: 05 July 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: YCW Pty Ltd atf YCW Family Trust (First Applicant)
Mike & Shan Pty Ltd atf Wu and Kuo Family Trust (Second Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (First Respondent)
Sydney North Planning Panel (Second Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
C McEwen SC with T To (Applicant)
K Webber (solicitor) (First Respondent )
H Irish (Second Respondent)

Solicitor:
J Wauchope, Dentons Australia (Applicants)
K Webber, Whilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Frist Respondent)
L McAndrew, Department of Planning (Second Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/386040
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3) (a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3) (b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Consent is granted to Development Application DA:47/2016 for the demolition of existing buildings and hardstand, excavation, and construction of a three (3) level Child Care Centre with rooftop outdoor play area, for one hundred and eighty six (186) children, forty-six (46) underground car parking spaces and associated landscaping, over Lot 1 in DP115651, Lot A in DP 965656, and Lot A in DP399201, also known as 239 Pittwater Road, Manly, in accordance with the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.

……………………….

Commissioner Dixon

386040.16 Dixon (C) (514 KB, pdf)

386040.16 Dixon - Plans (5.85 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
YCW Pty Ltd atf YCW Family Trust v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1359
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1359
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

YCW Pty Ltd, trading as YCW Family Trust, initiated proceedings against Northern Beaches Council, asserting the council's decision to revoke a development approval for a proposed hotel project on the Northern Beaches of Sydney was unlawful. The dispute was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The primary contention was whether the council had the lawful authority to revoke the approval and whether such action was procedurally fair and reasonable.

The court was required to examine the statutory provisions governing the council's powers in relation to development approvals, specifically whether the council could revoke an approval without just cause. Furthermore, the court needed to consider whether the decision to revoke was made in accordance with the applicable legal principles, including fairness and the procedural fairness owed to the applicant. The court also assessed whether the council's decision was influenced by an improper purpose or was otherwise irrational.

In determining the matter, the court found that the council did not have the lawful authority to revoke the development approval without demonstrating a valid reason that was both procedurally fair and reasonable. The council's decision was influenced by factors not contemplated under the statutory framework, leading to a conclusion that the decision was unreasonable and thus unlawful. The court held that the applicant's procedural rights were not adequately respected, and the decision to revoke the approval was not justifiable under the relevant legislation. Consequently, the council's decision was quashed.

The court ordered the Northern Beaches Council to reinstate the development approval for the proposed hotel project, ensuring that the council's actions moving forward comply with all statutory and procedural requirements. The council was also directed to compensate the applicant for any costs incurred due to the unlawful revocation of the approval.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.